From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [unavailable values part 1, 06/17] array element repeats, <unavailable> confused with 0.
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 14:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102071430.49735.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
With a program that has:
struct tuple
{
int a;
int b;
};
struct tuple tarray[8];
int main()
{
memset (tarray, 0xaa, sizeof tarray);
tarray[3].a = tarray[3].b = 0;
and a tracepoint that collects:
actions
collect tarray[0].a
collect tarray[1].a
collect tarray[3].a
collect tarray[3].b
collect tarray[4].b
collect tarray[5].b
end
We'd get:
(gdb) set print repeats 1
(gdb) set print pretty on
(gdb) p /x tarray
$3 = {{
a = 0xaaaaaaaa,
b = <unavailable>
} <repeats 2 times>, {
a = <unavailable>,
b = <unavailable>
} <repeats 2 times>, {
a = <unavailable>,
b = 0xaaaaaaaa
}, {
a = <unavailable>,
b = <unavailable>
} <repeats 3 times>}
(gdb)
Note that we confuse <unavailable> with 0x0.
That is, this part is wrong:
... {
a = <unavailable>,
b = <unavailable>
} <repeats 2 times>,
as tarray[3] had been completely collected,
but it has value 0, which GDB confused with
the previous <unavailable>.
The patch below fixes this. No isolated test: I'm
covering it in a larger test that tests a bunch
of <unavailable> cases.
--
Pedro Alves
2011-02-07 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
gdb/
* value.h (value_available_contents_eq): Declare.
* value.c (find_first_range_overlap): New function.
(value_available_contents_eq): New function.
* valprint.c (val_print_array_elements): Use
value_available_contents_eq.
* ada-valprint.c (val_print_packed_array_elements): Use
value_available_contents_eq.
* jv-valprint.c (java_value_print): Use
value_available_contents_eq.
---
gdb/ada-valprint.c | 4 +-
gdb/jv-valprint.c | 7 ++-
gdb/valprint.c | 8 ++--
gdb/value.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
gdb/value.h | 25 +++++++++++++
5 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: src/gdb/value.h
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/value.h 2011-02-07 11:15:02.926705996 +0000
+++ src/gdb/value.h 2011-02-07 11:15:23.176706001 +0000
@@ -374,6 +374,31 @@ extern int value_bytes_available (const
extern void mark_value_bytes_unavailable (struct value *value,
int offset, int length);
+/* Compare LENGTH bytes of VAL1's contents starting at OFFSET1 with
+ LENGTH bytes of VAL2's contents starting at OFFSET2. Returns true
+ iff the set of available contents match. Unavailable contents
+ compare equal with unavailable contents, and different with any
+ available byte. For example, if 'x's represent an unavailable
+ byte, and 'V' and 'Z' represent different available bytes, in a
+ value with length 16:
+
+ offset: 0 4 8 12 16
+ contents: xxxxVVVVxxxxVVZZ
+
+ then:
+
+ value_available_contents_eq(val, 0, val, 8, 6) => 1
+ value_available_contents_eq(val, 0, val, 4, 4) => 1
+ value_available_contents_eq(val, 0, val, 8, 8) => 0
+ value_available_contents_eq(val, 4, val, 12, 2) => 1
+ value_available_contents_eq(val, 4, val, 12, 4) => 0
+ value_available_contents_eq(val, 3, val, 4, 4) => 0
+*/
+
+extern int value_available_contents_eq (const struct value *val1, int offset1,
+ const struct value *val2, int offset2,
+ int length);
+
/* Read LENGTH bytes of memory starting at MEMADDR into BUFFER, which
is (or will be copied to) VAL's contents buffer offset by
EMBEDDED_OFFSET (that is, to &VAL->contents[EMBEDDED_OFFSET]).
Index: src/gdb/value.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/value.c 2011-02-07 11:12:35.406706000 +0000
+++ src/gdb/value.c 2011-02-07 11:15:23.176706001 +0000
@@ -357,6 +357,107 @@ mark_value_bytes_unavailable (struct val
}
}
+/* Find the first range in RANGES that overlaps the range defined by
+ OFFSET and LENGTH, starting at element POS in the RANGES vector,
+ Returns the index into RANGES where such overlapping range was
+ found, or -1 if none was found. */
+
+static int
+find_first_range_overlap (VEC(range_s) *ranges, int pos,
+ int offset, int length)
+{
+ range_s *r;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = pos; VEC_iterate (range_s, ranges, i, r); i++)
+ if (ranges_overlap (r->offset, r->length, offset, length))
+ return i;
+
+ return -1;
+}
+
+int
+value_available_contents_eq (const struct value *val1, int offset1,
+ const struct value *val2, int offset2,
+ int length)
+{
+ int org_len = length;
+ int org_offset1 = offset1;
+ int org_offset2 = offset2;
+ int idx1 = 0, idx2 = 0;
+ int prev_avail;
+
+ /* This routine is used by printing routines, where we should
+ already have read the value. Note that we only know whether a
+ value chunk is available if we've tried to read it. */
+ gdb_assert (!val1->lazy && !val2->lazy);
+
+ /* The offset from either ORG_OFFSET1 or ORG_OFFSET2 where the
+ available contents we haven't compared yet start. */
+ prev_avail = 0;
+
+ while (length > 0)
+ {
+ range_s *r1, *r2;
+ ULONGEST l1, h1;
+ ULONGEST l2, h2;
+
+ idx1 = find_first_range_overlap (val1->unavailable, idx1,
+ offset1, length);
+ idx2 = find_first_range_overlap (val2->unavailable, idx2,
+ offset2, length);
+
+ /* The usual case is for both values to be completely available. */
+ if (idx1 == -1 && idx2 == -1)
+ return (memcmp (val1->contents + org_offset1 + prev_avail,
+ val2->contents + org_offset2 + prev_avail,
+ org_len - prev_avail) == 0);
+ /* The contents only match equal if the available set matches as
+ well. */
+ else if (idx1 == -1 || idx2 == -1)
+ return 0;
+
+ gdb_assert (idx1 != -1 && idx2 != -1);
+
+ r1 = VEC_index (range_s, val1->unavailable, idx1);
+ r2 = VEC_index (range_s, val2->unavailable, idx2);
+
+ /* Get the unavailable windows intersected by the incoming
+ ranges. The first and last ranges that overlap the argument
+ range may be wider than said incoming arguments ranges. */
+ l1 = max (offset1, r1->offset);
+ h1 = min (offset1 + length, r1->offset + r1->length);
+
+ l2 = max (offset2, r2->offset);
+ h2 = min (offset2 + length, r2->offset + r2->length);
+
+ /* Make them relative to the respective start offsets, so we can
+ compare them for equality. */
+ l1 -= offset1;
+ h1 -= offset1;
+
+ l2 -= offset2;
+ h2 -= offset2;
+
+ /* Different availability, no match. */
+ if (l1 != l2 || h1 != h2)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Compare the _available_ contents. */
+ if (memcmp (val1->contents + org_offset1 + prev_avail,
+ val2->contents + org_offset2 + prev_avail,
+ l2 - prev_avail) != 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ prev_avail += h1;
+ length -= h1;
+ offset1 += h1;
+ offset2 += h1;
+ }
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
/* Prototypes for local functions. */
static void show_values (char *, int);
Index: src/gdb/valprint.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/valprint.c 2011-02-07 11:13:09.296706002 +0000
+++ src/gdb/valprint.c 2011-02-07 11:15:23.186706002 +0000
@@ -1242,9 +1242,11 @@ val_print_array_elements (struct type *t
rep1 = i + 1;
reps = 1;
while (rep1 < len
- && memcmp (valaddr + embedded_offset + i * eltlen,
- valaddr + embedded_offset + rep1 * eltlen,
- eltlen) == 0)
+ && value_available_contents_eq (val,
+ embedded_offset + i * eltlen,
+ val,
+ embedded_offset + rep1 * eltlen,
+ eltlen))
{
++reps;
++rep1;
Index: src/gdb/ada-valprint.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/ada-valprint.c 2011-02-07 10:54:23.076706000 +0000
+++ src/gdb/ada-valprint.c 2011-02-07 11:15:23.186706002 +0000
@@ -200,7 +200,9 @@ val_print_packed_array_elements (struct
(i * bitsize) / HOST_CHAR_BIT,
(i * bitsize) % HOST_CHAR_BIT,
bitsize, elttype);
- if (memcmp (value_contents (v0), value_contents (v1), eltlen) != 0)
+ if (!value_available_contents_eq (v0, value_embedded_offset (v0),
+ v1, value_embedded_offset (v1),
+ eltlen))
break;
}
Index: src/gdb/jv-valprint.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/jv-valprint.c 2011-02-07 10:54:23.086706001 +0000
+++ src/gdb/jv-valprint.c 2011-02-07 11:15:23.186706002 +0000
@@ -179,8 +179,11 @@ java_value_print (struct value *val, str
set_value_lazy (next_v, 1);
set_value_offset (next_v, value_offset (next_v)
+ TYPE_LENGTH (el_type));
- if (memcmp (value_contents (v), value_contents (next_v),
- TYPE_LENGTH (el_type)) != 0)
+ value_fetch_lazy (next_v);
+ if (!(value_available_contents_eq
+ (v, value_embedded_offset (v),
+ next_v, value_embedded_offset (next_v),
+ TYPE_LENGTH (el_type))))
break;
}
next reply other threads:[~2011-02-07 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-07 14:31 Pedro Alves [this message]
2011-02-14 12:00 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-02-15 18:34 ` Pedro Alves
2011-02-16 9:49 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-02-16 10:23 ` Pedro Alves
2011-02-16 11:12 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-02-16 18:26 ` Michael Snyder
2011-02-16 19:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-16 19:55 ` Michael Snyder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201102071430.49735.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox