From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] Convert hardware watchpoints to use breakpoint_ops
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:43:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101108184335.GG2933@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1287534691.2686.17.camel@hactar>
Just for the record, I've started looking at both patches, and already
spent a good hour on them. But I think that I should give myself some
time to to let every piece sink in, before I make an official review.
I urge another one of us to look at this change, because it's not
completely obvious. In particular, I think it was my suggestion
that prompted the move to using breakpoint_ops for watchpoints.
But it's not obvious that there is a gain. I think the gain shows up
in the second patch, where we avoid having:
1. To define new kinds for range and mask watchpoints
2. To program dispatching manually, Eg:
if (bp->print_one)
bp->print_one (...)
else if (bp->type == hw_watchpoint)
print_one_normal_watchpoint (...)
else if (bp->type == range_watchpoint)
print_one_range_watchpoint (...)
else if (bp->type == mask_watchpoint)
[...]
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-08 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-17 19:41 Thiago Jung Bauermann
2010-10-07 14:47 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2010-10-16 17:43 ` Pedro Alves
2010-10-20 0:31 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2010-11-04 21:17 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2010-11-08 18:43 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2010-11-08 21:39 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2010-11-15 22:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-11-16 19:03 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2010-11-18 17:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-11-19 20:10 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2010-12-23 19:06 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-01-11 19:31 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-04-29 15:51 ` "Cannot remove breakpoints because program is no longer writable" & catchpoints (was: Re: [patch 1/2] Convert hardware watchpoints to use breakpoint_ops) Pedro Alves
2010-11-16 4:06 ` [patch 1/2] Convert hardware watchpoints to use breakpoint_ops Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-16 8:07 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-11-16 18:51 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-17 3:47 ` [patch] Renaming: {insert,remove} += _location [Re: [patch 1/2] Convert hardware watchpoints to use breakpoint_ops] Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-18 17:13 ` Joel Brobecker
[not found] ` <20101117034556.GA12159@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
2010-11-18 17:15 ` [patch] renaming: bp_location: b->bl &co. " Joel Brobecker
2010-12-23 18:50 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2010-12-24 5:14 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-12-27 20:04 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101108184335.GG2933@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=bauerman@br.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox