Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] Convert hardware watchpoints to use breakpoint_ops
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101108184335.GG2933@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1287534691.2686.17.camel@hactar>

Just for the record, I've started looking at both patches, and already
spent a good hour on them. But I think that I should give myself some
time to to let every piece sink in, before I make an official review.

I urge another one of us to look at this change, because it's not
completely obvious. In particular, I think it was my suggestion
that prompted the move to using breakpoint_ops for watchpoints.
But it's not obvious that there is a gain.  I think the gain shows up
in the second patch, where we avoid having:
  
  1. To define new kinds for range and mask watchpoints

  2. To program dispatching manually, Eg:

     if (bp->print_one)
       bp->print_one (...)
     else if (bp->type == hw_watchpoint)
       print_one_normal_watchpoint (...)
     else if (bp->type == range_watchpoint)
       print_one_range_watchpoint (...)
     else if (bp->type == mask_watchpoint)
       [...]


-- 
Joel


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-11-08 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-17 19:41 Thiago Jung Bauermann
2010-10-07 14:47 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2010-10-16 17:43 ` Pedro Alves
2010-10-20  0:31   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2010-11-04 21:17     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2010-11-08 18:43     ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2010-11-08 21:39       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2010-11-15 22:23     ` Joel Brobecker
2010-11-16 19:03       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2010-11-18 17:18         ` Joel Brobecker
2010-11-19 20:10           ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2010-12-23 19:06             ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-01-11 19:31               ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-04-29 15:51                 ` "Cannot remove breakpoints because program is no longer writable" & catchpoints (was: Re: [patch 1/2] Convert hardware watchpoints to use breakpoint_ops) Pedro Alves
2010-11-16  4:06     ` [patch 1/2] Convert hardware watchpoints to use breakpoint_ops Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-16  8:07       ` Joel Brobecker
2010-11-16 18:51         ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-17  3:47           ` [patch] Renaming: {insert,remove} += _location [Re: [patch 1/2] Convert hardware watchpoints to use breakpoint_ops] Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-18 17:13             ` Joel Brobecker
     [not found]           ` <20101117034556.GA12159@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
2010-11-18 17:15             ` [patch] renaming: bp_location: b->bl &co. " Joel Brobecker
2010-12-23 18:50             ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2010-12-24  5:14               ` Joel Brobecker
2010-12-27 20:04                 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101108184335.GG2933@adacore.com \
    --to=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=bauerman@br.ibm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox