Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [commit] Fix timeouts in break-interp.exp on slow machines
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:23:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101012182337.GA15377@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201010121720.o9CHKTnM003520@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>

On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:20:29 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> This is once again caused by a gdb_expect clause with a ".*" wildcard that
> matches a large number of lines.  This can cause expect to slow down
> significantly, to the extent that the tests time out on slow machines.

OK, thanks for the fix.  I do not have the slowness reproducible here but
I thought gdb_expect is deprecated in the favor of gdb_test_multiple.

I do not mind but just curious if it could be rather coded this way or it
would be still slow/incompatible by the more patterns of gdb_test_multiple?

Tested on x86_64-fedora14snapshot-linux-gnu.


Thanks,
Jan


gdb/testsuite/
2010-10-12  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>

	* gdb.base/break-interp.exp (test_ld): Replace gdb_expect by
	gdb_test_multiple.

--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break-interp.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break-interp.exp
@@ -442,21 +442,19 @@ proc test_ld {file ifmain trynosym displacement} {
     if $ifmain {
 	reach "_dl_debug_state" run $displacement
 
-	# Use two separate gdb_expect statements to avoid timeouts due to
-	# slow processing of wildcard capturing long output
+	# Use two separate gdb_test_multiple statements to avoid timeouts due
+	# to slow processing of wildcard capturing long output
 	set test "info files"
 	set entrynohex ""
-	send_gdb "$test\n"
-	gdb_expect  {
+	gdb_test_multiple $test $test {
 	    -re "\r\n\[\t \]*Entry point:\[\t \]*0x(\[0-9a-f\]+)\r\n" {
 		set entrynohex $expect_out(1,string)
-	        gdb_expect {
-		    -re "$gdb_prompt $" { pass $test }
-		    timeout { fail "$test (timeout)" }
+		gdb_test_multiple "" $test {
+		    -re "\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+			pass $test
+		    }
 		}
 	    }
-	    -re ".*$gdb_prompt $"  { fail $test }
-	    timeout         { fail "$test (timeout)" }
 	}
 
 	# `info sym' cannot be tested for .opd as the binary may not have


  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-12 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-12 17:20 Ulrich Weigand
2010-10-12 18:23 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2010-10-12 18:37   ` Ulrich Weigand
2010-10-12 18:41     ` Jan Kratochvil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101012182337.GA15377@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net \
    --to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox