Re: Fixes for a couple of infrun bugs (thread hop, revert to step thread).

[Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>]

On Monday 16 August 2010 19:40:47, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Pedro Alves wrote:
> 
> > Replacing the "next" by a "continue" should work.  I've looked over the
> > original description of the problem this is covering, and, that
> > would still exercise the problem (which is gdb trying to step
> > the other (main) thread with inferior_ptid still pointing at
> > the thread that was being "next"ed, and in the process failing
> > to remove breakpoints from memory because inferior_ptid pointed
> > at an inferior thread.
> 
> But isn't the code your patch changes under an if that's only true
> if another thread is currently being stepped or nexted?  If we just
> do "continue" here, that's no longer the case, and the code wouldn't
> be exercised at all ...

That's also exercised by the other test my original patch added,
IIRC (gdb.thread/thread-execl.exp).  There were two bugs fixed by
that patch.  The specific bug the threxit-hop-specific.exp test is
covering is the "failing to remove breakpoints" one.

-- 
Pedro Alves