Re: [RFA] gdb.gdb/*.exp send_gdb vs. gdb_test

[Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>]

> 2010-05-25  Michael Snyder  <msnyder@vmware.com>
> 
> 	* gdb.gdb/complaints.exp: Replace send_gdb with gdb_test.
> 	* gdb.gdb/selftest.exp: Replace send_gdb with gdb_test.
> 	* gdb.gdb/xfullpath.exp: Replace send_gdb with gdb_test.

Same question as before: Can you double-check that gdb_test cannot
be used in the cases below? If not, OK to commit.

>      # Add a second complaint, expect it
> -    send_gdb "call complaint (&symfile_complaints, \"serial line 2\")\n"
> -    gdb_expect {
> +    gdb_test_multiple "call complaint (&symfile_complaints, \"serial line 2\")" "serial line 2" {
>  	-re "serial line 2...$gdb_prompt " {
>  	    pass "serial line 2"
>  	}
> -	"$gdb_prompt" {
> -	    fail "serial line 2"
> -	}
> -	timeout {
> -	    fail "serial line 2 (timeout)"
> -	}

Can we use gdb_test here?

> -    send_gdb "call complaint (&symfile_complaints, \"short line 1\")\n"
> -    gdb_expect {
> +    gdb_test_multiple "call complaint (&symfile_complaints, \"short line 1\")" "short line 1" {
>  	-re "short line 1...$gdb_prompt " {
>  	    pass "short line 1"

Ditto?

>      # Add a second complaint, expect it
> -    send_gdb "call complaint (&symfile_complaints, \"short line 2\")\n"
> -    gdb_expect {
> +    gdb_test_multiple "call complaint (&symfile_complaints, \"short line 2\")" "short line 2" {

Ditto again.

-- 
Joel