Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC] Set default value of detach_fork to off
@ 2010-05-08 12:19 Hui Zhu
  2010-05-08 12:31 ` Mark Kettenis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hui Zhu @ 2010-05-08 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches ml

Hi guys,

Looks multi-inferior is more better than before.  I suggest set
default value of detach_fork to off.
Then when the user debug the multi-process program, they can debug the
inferior like multi-thread inferior.

What do you think about it?

Thanks,
Hui

2010-05-08  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>

	* infrun.c (detach_fork): Change default value to 0.


---
 infrun.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/infrun.c
+++ b/infrun.c
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ int sync_execution = 0;
 static ptid_t previous_inferior_ptid;

 /* Default behavior is to detach newly forked processes (legacy).  */
-int detach_fork = 1;
+int detach_fork = 0;

 int debug_displaced = 0;
 static void


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] Set default value of detach_fork to off
  2010-05-08 12:19 [RFC] Set default value of detach_fork to off Hui Zhu
@ 2010-05-08 12:31 ` Mark Kettenis
  2010-05-08 13:16   ` Joel Brobecker
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Kettenis @ 2010-05-08 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: teawater; +Cc: gdb-patches

> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 20:19:29 +0800
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> Looks multi-inferior is more better than before.  I suggest set
> default value of detach_fork to off.
> Then when the user debug the multi-process program, they can debug the
> inferior like multi-thread inferior.
> 
> What do you think about it?

I think we should keep the current default.  While the ability to
debug both sides of a fork is a nice feature to have, I think most
people are only interested in debugging the process they started the
debugger on.  It is not unusual for programs to use system(3) to
execute system binaries, and I doubt people are interested in
debugging those.  Typically those binaries will be stripped anyway.
Setting detach_fork to off will only interfere.
> 
> 2010-05-08  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
> 
> 	* infrun.c (detach_fork): Change default value to 0.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] Set default value of detach_fork to off
  2010-05-08 12:31 ` Mark Kettenis
@ 2010-05-08 13:16   ` Joel Brobecker
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2010-05-08 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Kettenis; +Cc: teawater, gdb-patches

> I think we should keep the current default.  While the ability to
> debug both sides of a fork is a nice feature to have, I think most
> people are only interested in debugging the process they started the
> debugger on.  It is not unusual for programs to use system(3) to
> execute system binaries, and I doubt people are interested in
> debugging those.  Typically those binaries will be stripped anyway.
> Setting detach_fork to off will only interfere.

Agreed.

-- 
Joel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-08 13:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-08 12:19 [RFC] Set default value of detach_fork to off Hui Zhu
2010-05-08 12:31 ` Mark Kettenis
2010-05-08 13:16   ` Joel Brobecker

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox