From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: hjl.tools@gmail.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix 32bit coredump read on Linux/AVX
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201004211937.o3LJbs6Q019095@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100420184339.GA18641@intel.com> (hongjiu.lu@intel.com)
> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:43:39 -0700
> From: "H.J. Lu" <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 08:22:34PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch:
> >
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-04/msg00276.html
Sorry about that. I thought that you had tested that diff.
> > breaks 32bit coredump read on Linux/AVX since we only dump .reg and
> > .reg-xstate sections on AVX. But i386_linux_core_read_description
> > checks .reg2 and .reg-xfp sections first. Since there are no
> > .reg2 and .reg-xfp sections, NULL is returned and SSE target is used.
> > This patch changes the section check order to .reg-xstate, .reg-xfp,
> > .reg2. OK to install?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
>
> .reg2 section has x87 regiters on i386 and SSE registers on amd64.
> Here is the updated patch to properly handle it. OK to install?
Not quite.
> 2010-04-20 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>
> PR corefiles/11523
> * amd64-linux-tdep.c (amd64_linux_core_read_description): Check
> XCR0 first.
>
> * i386-linux-tdep.c (i386_linux_core_read_xcr0): Return 0 if
> there is no .reg-xstate section.
> (i386_linux_core_read_description): Check XCR0 first.
>
> diff --git a/gdb/amd64-linux-tdep.c b/gdb/amd64-linux-tdep.c
> index f249d5d..1f7a052 100644
> --- a/gdb/amd64-linux-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/amd64-linux-tdep.c
> @@ -1269,18 +1269,23 @@ amd64_linux_core_read_description (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
> struct target_ops *target,
> bfd *abfd)
> {
> - asection *section = bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, ".reg2");
> - uint64_t xcr0;
> -
> - if (section == NULL)
> - return NULL;
> -
> /* Linux/x86-64. */
> - xcr0 = i386_linux_core_read_xcr0 (gdbarch, target, abfd);
> - if ((xcr0 & I386_XSTATE_AVX_MASK) == I386_XSTATE_AVX_MASK)
> - return tdesc_amd64_avx_linux;
> - else
> + uint64_t xcr0 = i386_linux_core_read_xcr0 (gdbarch, target, abfd);
> + switch ((xcr0 & I386_XSTATE_AVX_MASK))
> + {
> + case I386_XSTATE_AVX_MASK:
> + return tdesc_amd64_avx_linux;
> + return tdesc_i386_avx_linux;
There's a duplicate return statement there.
> + case I386_XSTATE_SSE_MASK:
> + return tdesc_amd64_linux;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, ".reg2") != NULL)
> return tdesc_amd64_linux;
> + else
> + return NULL;
I think we should always return tdesc_amd64_linux here. That is the
minimal target description for amd64.
> diff --git a/gdb/i386-linux-tdep.c b/gdb/i386-linux-tdep.c
> index 5952153..ee7c23f 100644
> --- a/gdb/i386-linux-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/i386-linux-tdep.c
> @@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ i386_linux_core_read_xcr0 (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
> }
> }
> else
> - xcr0 = I386_XSTATE_SSE_MASK;
> + xcr0 = 0;
>
> return xcr0;
> }
> @@ -623,22 +623,26 @@ i386_linux_core_read_description (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
> struct target_ops *target,
> bfd *abfd)
> {
> - asection *section = bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, ".reg2");
> - uint64_t xcr0;
> -
> - if (section == NULL)
> - return NULL;
> + /* Linux/i386. */
> + uint64_t xcr0 = i386_linux_core_read_xcr0 (gdbarch, target, abfd);
> + switch ((xcr0 & I386_XSTATE_AVX_MASK))
> + {
> + case I386_XSTATE_AVX_MASK:
> + return tdesc_i386_avx_linux;
> + case I386_XSTATE_SSE_MASK:
> + return tdesc_i386_linux;
> + case I386_XSTATE_X87_MASK:
> + return tdesc_i386_mmx_linux;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
This is fine, however,
> - section = bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, ".reg-xfp");
> - if (section == NULL)
> + if (bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, ".reg-xfp") != NULL)
> + return tdesc_i386_linux;
> + else if (bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, ".reg2") != NULL)
> return tdesc_i386_mmx_linux;
> -
> - /* Linux/i386. */
> - xcr0 = i386_linux_core_read_xcr0 (gdbarch, target, abfd);
> - if ((xcr0 & I386_XSTATE_AVX_MASK) == I386_XSTATE_AVX_MASK)
> - return tdesc_i386_avx_linux;
> else
> - return tdesc_i386_linux;
> + return NULL;
I think we should return tdesc_i386_linux if ".reg-xfp" is found,
otherwise return tdesc_i386_mmx_linux.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-21 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-20 3:22 H.J. Lu
2010-04-20 18:43 ` H.J. Lu
2010-04-21 14:32 ` H.J. Lu
2010-04-21 19:38 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2010-04-21 20:18 ` H.J. Lu
2010-04-21 20:24 ` Mark Kettenis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201004211937.o3LJbs6Q019095@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox