Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: hjl.tools@gmail.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix 32bit coredump read on Linux/AVX
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:38:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201004211937.o3LJbs6Q019095@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100420184339.GA18641@intel.com> (hongjiu.lu@intel.com)

> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:43:39 -0700
> From: "H.J. Lu" <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
> 
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 08:22:34PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This patch:
> > 
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-04/msg00276.html

Sorry about that.  I thought that you had tested that diff.

> > breaks 32bit coredump read on Linux/AVX since we only dump .reg and
> > .reg-xstate sections on AVX. But i386_linux_core_read_description
> > checks .reg2 and .reg-xfp sections first. Since there are no
> > .reg2 and .reg-xfp sections, NULL is returned and SSE target is used.
> > This patch changes the section check order to .reg-xstate, .reg-xfp,
> > .reg2.  OK to install?
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> 
> .reg2 section has x87 regiters on i386 and SSE registers on amd64.
> Here is the updated patch to properly handle it.  OK to install?

Not quite.

> 2010-04-20  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
> 
> 	PR corefiles/11523
> 	* amd64-linux-tdep.c (amd64_linux_core_read_description): Check
> 	XCR0 first.
> 
> 	* i386-linux-tdep.c (i386_linux_core_read_xcr0): Return 0 if
> 	there is no .reg-xstate section.
> 	(i386_linux_core_read_description): Check XCR0 first.
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/amd64-linux-tdep.c b/gdb/amd64-linux-tdep.c
> index f249d5d..1f7a052 100644
> --- a/gdb/amd64-linux-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/amd64-linux-tdep.c
> @@ -1269,18 +1269,23 @@ amd64_linux_core_read_description (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
>  				  struct target_ops *target,
>  				  bfd *abfd)
>  {
> -  asection *section = bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, ".reg2");
> -  uint64_t xcr0;
> -
> -  if (section == NULL)
> -    return NULL;
> -
>    /* Linux/x86-64.  */
> -  xcr0 = i386_linux_core_read_xcr0 (gdbarch, target, abfd);
> -  if ((xcr0 & I386_XSTATE_AVX_MASK) == I386_XSTATE_AVX_MASK)
> -    return tdesc_amd64_avx_linux;
> -  else
> +  uint64_t xcr0 = i386_linux_core_read_xcr0 (gdbarch, target, abfd);
> +  switch ((xcr0 & I386_XSTATE_AVX_MASK))
> +    {
> +    case I386_XSTATE_AVX_MASK:
> +      return tdesc_amd64_avx_linux;
> +      return tdesc_i386_avx_linux;

There's a duplicate return statement there.

> +    case I386_XSTATE_SSE_MASK:
> +      return tdesc_amd64_linux;
> +    default:
> +      break;
> +    }
> +
> +  if (bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, ".reg2") != NULL)
>      return tdesc_amd64_linux;
> +  else
> +    return NULL;

I think we should always return tdesc_amd64_linux here.  That is the
minimal target description for amd64.

> diff --git a/gdb/i386-linux-tdep.c b/gdb/i386-linux-tdep.c
> index 5952153..ee7c23f 100644
> --- a/gdb/i386-linux-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/i386-linux-tdep.c
> @@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ i386_linux_core_read_xcr0 (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
>  	}
>      }
>    else
> -    xcr0 = I386_XSTATE_SSE_MASK;
> +    xcr0 = 0;
>  
>    return xcr0;
>  }
> @@ -623,22 +623,26 @@ i386_linux_core_read_description (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
>  				  struct target_ops *target,
>  				  bfd *abfd)
>  {
> -  asection *section = bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, ".reg2");
> -  uint64_t xcr0;
> -
> -  if (section == NULL)
> -    return NULL;
> +  /* Linux/i386.  */
> +  uint64_t xcr0 = i386_linux_core_read_xcr0 (gdbarch, target, abfd);
> +  switch ((xcr0 & I386_XSTATE_AVX_MASK))
> +    {
> +    case I386_XSTATE_AVX_MASK:
> +      return tdesc_i386_avx_linux;
> +    case I386_XSTATE_SSE_MASK:
> +      return tdesc_i386_linux;
> +    case I386_XSTATE_X87_MASK:
> +      return tdesc_i386_mmx_linux;
> +    default:
> +      break;
> +    }

This is fine, however,

> -  section = bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, ".reg-xfp");
> -  if (section == NULL)
> +  if (bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, ".reg-xfp") != NULL)
> +    return tdesc_i386_linux;
> +  else if (bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, ".reg2") != NULL)
>      return tdesc_i386_mmx_linux;
> -
> -  /* Linux/i386.  */
> -  xcr0 = i386_linux_core_read_xcr0 (gdbarch, target, abfd);
> -  if ((xcr0 & I386_XSTATE_AVX_MASK) == I386_XSTATE_AVX_MASK)
> -    return tdesc_i386_avx_linux;
>    else
> -    return tdesc_i386_linux;
> +    return NULL;

I think we should return tdesc_i386_linux if ".reg-xfp" is found,
otherwise return tdesc_i386_mmx_linux.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-21 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-20  3:22 H.J. Lu
2010-04-20 18:43 ` H.J. Lu
2010-04-21 14:32   ` H.J. Lu
2010-04-21 19:38   ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2010-04-21 20:18   ` H.J. Lu
2010-04-21 20:24     ` Mark Kettenis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201004211937.o3LJbs6Q019095@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
    --to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox