From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: New `logical*8' type for Fortran
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 06:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100416060916.GA29503@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201004152001.22206.sergiodj@redhat.com>
Hi Sergio,
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:01:21 +0200, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> This patch has been in our tree for a while and we would like to see it
> upstream. Jan asked me to take care of this, so I would like to post it for
> your appreciation. Comments are welcome as usual.
sorry for follow-up from me:
> 2010-04-15 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
>
> * f-exp.y: Add new production to recognize the `logical*8' type.
> (LOGICAL_S8_KEYWORD): New token.
>
> * f-lang.c (enum f_primitive_types)
> <f_primitive_type_logical_s8>: New field.
> (f_language_arch_info): Handling `logical*8' type.
> (build_fortran_types): Building `logical*8' type.
>
> * f-lang.h (builtin_logical_s8): New struct.
It is a new field of struct builtin_f_type, not a new struct.
Also these changes depend each on the other so there should not be empty lines
between the changes. (6.8.2 Style of Change Logs)
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2010-04-15 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
>
> * gdb.fortran/logical.exp: New testcase.
> * gdb.fortran/logical.f90: New file.
As you did some *.exp modifications you should list yourself here (in the case
you explicitly do not want to be listed there I do not know what the rules are).
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/logical.exp
> +# Copyright 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/logical.f90
> +! Copyright 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
The your should be changed as the patch was neither in FSF GDB nor in Archer.
> +! Ihis file is the Fortran source file for dynamic.exp.
This is not true.
> +! Original file written by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>.
This is not true (it was for dynamic.exp where the code size was not trivial).
> +! Modified for the GDB testcase by Jan Kratochvil
> <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>.
Patch lines are corrupted (wrapped) by your MUA (mail user agent).
Thanks,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-16 6:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-15 23:01 Sergio Durigan Junior
2010-04-16 6:09 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2010-04-16 15:48 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2010-04-16 16:03 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-04-18 21:48 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2010-04-19 2:53 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-04-19 20:17 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2010-04-20 15:55 ` Tom Tromey
2010-04-20 17:23 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100416060916.GA29503@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox