Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
Cc: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>,
		gdb-patches ml <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
		"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA 3/5] Prec: x86 segment register support: target
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100316200424.GA29097@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B9FCA21.9020904@vmware.com>

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:12:49AM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
> However, isn't target.c the wrong place for this function?
> Wouldn't it belong better in the gdbarch?  It is architecture-
> specific, if I understand correctly.
> 
> That is, this will be the same between i386-ptrace and i386-remote,
> but different between i386-remote and (say) mips-remote.

IMO, these should simply be added as new registers.  Since the name
$gs is already taken, why not add a $gs_base register?

H.J. Lu has recently converted the i386 target to use target
descriptions; it should be easy to add new registers now.
They could go in 32bit-linux.xml or in some other file that could be
shared among OS's.  H.J. may have some more ideas.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-16 20:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-16 16:53 Hui Zhu
2010-03-16 18:12 ` Michael Snyder
2010-03-16 20:04   ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2010-03-22 14:03     ` Hui Zhu
2010-03-22 14:35       ` H.J. Lu
2010-03-22 14:44         ` Hui Zhu
2010-03-22 15:05         ` Mark Kettenis
2010-03-22 14:35       ` Mark Kettenis
2010-03-22 14:45         ` Hui Zhu
2010-03-22 14:53         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-03-22 18:04           ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-03-22 18:14             ` Doug Evans
2010-03-22 16:03         ` Doug Evans

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100316200424.GA29097@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=dan@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
    --cc=teawater@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox