Re: [MI tracepoints 2/9] unify breakpoint commands and tracepoint actions

[Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>]

Is this the final patch?  I ask because I'm seeing some of the same
issues that I pointed out before offlist.

On Sunday 14 March 2010 08:47:33, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> +      /** We need to verify that each top-level element of commands
> +         is valid for tracepoints, that there's at most one while-stepping


> +#gdb_test "info tracepoints" \
> +#    "Num     Type\[ \]+Disp Enb Address\[ \]+What.*
> +#.*while-stepping $stepcount.*" \
> +
> +
> +

Please also fix this:

> @@ -252,6 +252,8 @@ mi_cmd_break_commands (char *command, char **argv, int argc)
>    int bnum;
>    struct breakpoint *b;
>  
> +  extern void check_tracepoint_command (char *line, void *closure);


This is not a review.

-- 
Pedro Alves