Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
		GDB <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix CLONE_VM vs. TLS  [Re: Is CLONE_VM really needed  in  gdbserver?]
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:01:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100128170103.GA9936@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100127221236.GA4746@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:12:36PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> No regressions on {x86_64,x86_64-m32,i686}-fedora12-linux-gnu and on
> x86_64-fedora12-linux-gnu via gdbserver.
> 
> Verified linux_supports_tracefork_flag gets still set with the patch.
> 
> Verified unsetting HAVE_FORK for gdb/gdbserver/ still works the same.
> 
> gdb/ already tests HAVE_FORK in config.in but it is brought in by other
> macros, therefore rather added an explicit configure.ac test for it.
> 
> Have not found an easy enough uClinux disk image of some arch for qemu-*.

I don't recommend testing HAVE_FORK; uClibc may provide a dummy fork
that returns ENOSYS.  There's a HAS_NOMMU in linux-low.c that should work.

For the test case, what defines UCLINUX?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-28 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <6dc9ffc81001261551j6221db6v88e96713d6dd9497@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <20100127000821.GA29862@caradoc.them.org>
2010-01-27 22:12   ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-01-28 16:22     ` H.J. Lu
2010-01-28 17:01     ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2010-01-29  1:26       ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-01-29  2:30         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-01-29 12:41           ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-02-01 20:20             ` Jan Kratochvil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100128170103.GA9936@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=dan@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox