Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>,
		"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>,
		"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PING][PATCH] ARM/Linux: Unwind restart_syscall(2) frames
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091222161747.GA3211@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1261495721.26179.67.camel@e200601-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 03:28:41PM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> It's not code that I'm familiar with, however...
> 
> 	svc	0x00900000
> 	ldr	pc, [sp], #12
> then
> 
> +  trad_frame_set_reg_value (this_cache, ARM_SP_REGNUM, sp + 12);
> 
> So why is the stack pointer /incremented/ by 12 at this point (which
> deallocates stack) rather than decremented to compensate for the
> increment that will follow?  Also, shouldn't the stack allocation be a
> multiple of 8 to fully conform to the ABI stack alignment constraints?

We're before execution of the above trampoline at this point, trying
to compensate for it; that's why the stack goes up, we're simulating
return from the trampoline.  The code sequence was chosen by the
kernel, weird stack alignment and all.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


      reply	other threads:[~2009-12-22 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-18 14:13 Maciej W. Rozycki
2009-12-18 19:35 ` Michael Snyder
2009-12-22 15:28   ` Richard Earnshaw
2009-12-22 16:17     ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091222161747.GA3211@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=macro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
    --cc=rearnsha@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox