Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [rfc] Re-parse display expressions if architecture changes
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912211533.nBLFX5ux028195@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> (raw)

Hello,

I've run into a problem caused by the architecture being stored in a parsed
expression structure.  This shows up if you use a display expression that
depends on architecture features like register numbers, e.g.
  display/i $pc
and subsequently the current architecture changes.  This could happen e.g.
by connecting to a remote target that provides a target description with
extra registers, or in a multi-architecture scenario like Cell/B.E. when
control is passed to code using a different architecture.

I think the expectation with a display statement like the above should
clearly be that whenever the inferior stops, the current PC is displayed
according to whatever architecture is currently in force.

The patch below implements this by ensuring the expression is re-parsed
if the currnet architecture is different from the one the expression
was originally parsed in.

Tested on s390(x)-linux in conjunction with the "32-bit application
with 64-bit register set" patch.

Any comments?  I'm planning to apply this next week.

Bye,
Ulrich


ChangeLog:

	* printcmd.c: Include "arch-utils.h".
	(do_one_display): Re-parse expression if current architecture changed.


diff -urNp gdb-orig/gdb/printcmd.c gdb-head/gdb/printcmd.c
--- gdb-orig/gdb/printcmd.c	2009-12-18 17:27:13.000000000 +0100
+++ gdb-head/gdb/printcmd.c	2009-12-21 15:07:50.000000000 +0100
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
 #include "solib.h"
 #include "parser-defs.h"
 #include "charset.h"
+#include "arch-utils.h"
 
 #ifdef TUI
 #include "tui/tui.h"		/* For tui_active et.al.   */
@@ -1597,7 +1598,15 @@ do_one_display (struct display *d)
   if (d->enabled_p == 0)
     return;
 
-  if (d->exp == NULL)
+  /* The expression carries the architecture that was used at parse time.
+     This is a problem if the expression depends on architecture features
+     (e.g. register numbers), and the current architecture is now different.
+     For example, a display statement like "display/i $pc" is expected to
+     display the PC register of the current architecture, not the arch at
+     the time the display command was given.  Therefore, we re-parse the
+     expression if the current architecture has changed.  */
+  if (d->exp == NULL
+      || d->exp->gdbarch != get_current_arch ())
     {
       volatile struct gdb_exception ex;
       TRY_CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ALL)
-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


             reply	other threads:[~2009-12-21 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-21 15:33 Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2009-12-21 20:32 ` Tom Tromey
2009-12-22 14:12   ` Ulrich Weigand
2010-01-04 15:05     ` Ulrich Weigand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200912211533.nBLFX5ux028195@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com \
    --to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox