From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Andrew Stubbs <ams@codesourcery.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>,
Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>,
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Fix "break *EXP thread NUM"
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091124150533.GA8964@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091124145422.GA26004@adacore.com>
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:54:22AM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> I'm a little tied up at the moment, but I can take care of this.
Thanks!
Meanwhile, here's a patch that handles "t" and "task". I talked to
Andrew about this, and I still think we can get away without "+N" and
"-N"; they're only accepted by an accident of strtol.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
2009-11-23 Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
* breakpoint.c (find_condition_and_thread): Correct task error message.
* c-exp.y (yylex): Stop before "thread N", "task N", or abbreviations
of those.
* gdb.texinfo (Thread-Specific Breakpoints): Thread specifiers
are allowed after the breakpoint condition.
* gdb.base/condbreak.exp: Test combinations of "break *EXP",
"if", and "thread". Correct matching in the previous test.
Index: breakpoint.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/breakpoint.c,v
retrieving revision 1.435
diff -u -p -r1.435 breakpoint.c
--- breakpoint.c 22 Nov 2009 15:38:58 -0000 1.435
+++ breakpoint.c 24 Nov 2009 15:03:10 -0000
@@ -6635,7 +6635,7 @@ find_condition_and_thread (char *tok, CO
if (tok == tmptok)
error (_("Junk after task keyword."));
if (!valid_task_id (*task))
- error (_("Unknown task %d\n"), *task);
+ error (_("Unknown task %d."), *task);
}
else
error (_("Junk at end of arguments."));
Index: c-exp.y
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/c-exp.y,v
retrieving revision 1.65
diff -u -p -r1.65 c-exp.y
--- c-exp.y 11 Nov 2009 16:45:46 -0000 1.65
+++ c-exp.y 24 Nov 2009 15:03:10 -0000
@@ -2250,6 +2250,24 @@ yylex (void)
return 0;
}
+ /* For the same reason (breakpoint conditions), "thread N"
+ terminates the expression. "thread" could be an identifier, but
+ an identifier is never followed by a number without intervening
+ punctuation. "task" is similar. Handle abbreviations of these,
+ similarly to breakpoint.c:find_condition_and_thread. */
+ if (namelen >= 1
+ && (strncmp (tokstart, "thread", namelen) == 0
+ || strncmp (tokstart, "task", namelen) == 0)
+ && (tokstart[namelen] == ' ' || tokstart[namelen] == '\t')
+ && ! scanning_macro_expansion ())
+ {
+ char *p = tokstart + namelen + 1;
+ while (*p == ' ' || *p == '\t')
+ p++;
+ if (*p >= '0' && *p <= '9')
+ return 0;
+ }
+
lexptr += namelen;
tryname:
Index: doc/gdb.texinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.642
diff -u -p -r1.642 gdb.texinfo
--- doc/gdb.texinfo 23 Nov 2009 18:44:10 -0000 1.642
+++ doc/gdb.texinfo 24 Nov 2009 15:03:15 -0000
@@ -5214,8 +5214,8 @@ breakpoint, the breakpoint applies to @e
program.
You can use the @code{thread} qualifier on conditional breakpoints as
-well; in this case, place @samp{thread @var{threadno}} before the
-breakpoint condition, like this:
+well; in this case, place @samp{thread @var{threadno}} before or
+after the breakpoint condition, like this:
@smallexample
(@value{GDBP}) break frik.c:13 thread 28 if bartab > lim
Index: testsuite/gdb.base/condbreak.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/condbreak.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -p -r1.13 condbreak.exp
--- testsuite/gdb.base/condbreak.exp 3 Jan 2009 05:58:03 -0000 1.13
+++ testsuite/gdb.base/condbreak.exp 24 Nov 2009 15:03:15 -0000
@@ -207,10 +207,10 @@ gdb_expect {
setup_xfail hppa2.0w-*-* 11512CLLbs
send_gdb "continue\n"
gdb_expect {
- -re "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, marker2 \\(a=43\\) at .*$srcfile1:($bp_location8|$bp_location9).*($bp_location8|$bp_location9)\[\t \]+.*" {
+ -re "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, marker2 \\(a=43\\) at .*$srcfile1:($bp_location8|$bp_location9).*($bp_location8|$bp_location9)\[\t \]+.*$gdb_prompt $" {
pass "run until breakpoint at marker2"
}
- -re "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, $hex in marker2 \\(a=43\\) at .*$srcfile1:($bp_location8|$bp_location9).*($bp_location8|$bp_location9)\[\t \]+.*" {
+ -re "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, $hex in marker2 \\(a=43\\) at .*$srcfile1:($bp_location8|$bp_location9).*($bp_location8|$bp_location9)\[\t \]+.*$gdb_prompt $" {
xfail "run until breakpoint at marker2"
}
-re "$gdb_prompt $" {
@@ -220,3 +220,30 @@ gdb_expect {
fail "(timeout) run until breakpoint at marker2"
}
}
+
+# Test combinations of conditional and thread-specific breakpoints.
+gdb_test "break main if (1==1) thread 999" \
+ "Unknown thread 999\\."
+gdb_test "break main thread 999 if (1==1)" \
+ "Unknown thread 999\\."
+
+# Verify that both if and thread can be distinguished from a breakpoint
+# address expression.
+gdb_test "break *main if (1==1) thread 999" \
+ "Unknown thread 999\\."
+gdb_test "break *main thread 999 if (1==1)" \
+ "Unknown thread 999\\."
+
+# Similarly for task.
+gdb_test "break *main if (1==1) task 999" \
+ "Unknown task 999\\."
+gdb_test "break *main task 999 if (1==1)" \
+ "Unknown task 999\\."
+
+# GDB accepts abbreviations for "thread" and "task".
+gdb_test "break *main if (1==1) t 999" \
+ "Unknown thread 999\\."
+gdb_test "break *main if (1==1) th 999" \
+ "Unknown thread 999\\."
+gdb_test "break *main if (1==1) ta 999" \
+ "Unknown task 999\\."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-24 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-23 21:27 Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-11-24 0:21 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-11-24 10:33 ` Andrew Stubbs
2009-11-24 14:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-11-24 14:54 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-11-24 15:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2009-11-25 20:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-12-01 19:53 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2009-12-01 20:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-01-01 6:31 ` [commit] Fix "break *EXP thread/task NUM" for Ada (was: "Re: RFC: Fix "break *EXP thread NUM"") Joel Brobecker
2009-11-24 17:08 ` RFC: Fix "break *EXP thread NUM" Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091124150533.GA8964@caradoc.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=ams@codesourcery.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=macro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=vladimir@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox