From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix parallel gdb/ make check//% site.exp
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:20:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091109171950.GA6665@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e394668d0911090838p7c80b22ch3019c811db1d9b5f@mail.gmail.com> <m3ljiflneh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:37:42 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
>
> Jan> -check-single: all site.exp
> Jan> +check-single: all ./site.exp
>
> I think make will still search vpath for "./site.exp".
> So, won't that cause the same problem?
A nice catch, verified now VPATH does work even for relative paths. The only
safe way is to use absolute path there.
make-3.81/ vpath_search():
/* If there are no VPATH entries or FILENAME starts at the root,
there is nothing we can do. */
> What am I missing?
It was a testing mistake as when I edited ./Makefile I changed its timestamp
which did falsely "fix" it by:
Considering target file `site.exp'.
Pruning file `config.status'.
Pruning file `Makefile'.
Finished prerequisites of target file `site.exp'.
Prerequisite `config.status' is older than target `site.exp'.
Prerequisite `Makefile' is newer than target `site.exp'.
Must remake target `site.exp'.
Ignoring VPATH name `/home/jkratoch/redhat/gdb-clean/gdb/testsuite/site.exp'.
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:38:04 +0100, Doug Evans wrote:
> but if the patch does go in, I'd like to see comments added to the
> code explaining why things are the way they are.
> site vs ./site.exp seems fairly subtle.
Followed.
Thanks,
Jan
gdb/testsuite/
2009-11-09 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* Makefile.in (abs_builddir): New.
(site.exp): New target `$(abs_builddir)/site.exp'. New comment.
(check-single, $(TEST_TARGETS), check-gdb.base%): Change `site.exp' to
`$(abs_builddir)/site.exp'.
--- a/gdb/testsuite/Makefile.in
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/Makefile.in
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ VPATH = @srcdir@
srcdir = @srcdir@
prefix = @prefix@
exec_prefix = @exec_prefix@
+abs_builddir = @abs_builddir@
target_alias = @target_noncanonical@
program_transform_name = @program_transform_name@
@@ -102,7 +103,11 @@ install:
uninstall: force
-site.exp: ./config.status Makefile
+# Use absolute `site.exp' path everywhere to suppress VPATH lookups for it.
+# $(RUNTEST) is looking up `site.exp' only in the current directory.
+# Bare `site.exp' is present as a target here if user requests it explicitly.
+
+$(abs_builddir)/site.exp site.exp: ./config.status Makefile
@echo "Making a new config file..."
-@rm -f ./tmp?
@touch site.exp
@@ -147,7 +151,7 @@ DO_RUNTEST = \
export TCL_LIBRARY ; fi ; \
$(RUNTEST)
-check-single: all site.exp
+check-single: all $(abs_builddir)/site.exp
$(DO_RUNTEST) $(RUNTESTFLAGS)
# A list of all directories named "gdb.*" which also hold a .exp file.
@@ -170,7 +174,7 @@ check-parallel:
$(SHELL) $(srcdir)/dg-extract-results.sh -L \
$(addsuffix /gdb.log,$(TEST_DIRS)) > gdb.log
-$(filter-out check-gdb.base%,$(TEST_TARGETS)): check-gdb.%: all site.exp
+$(filter-out check-gdb.base%,$(TEST_TARGETS)): check-gdb.%: all $(abs_builddir)/site.exp
@if test ! -d gdb.$*; then mkdir gdb.$*; fi
$(DO_RUNTEST) --directory=gdb.$* --outdir=gdb.$* $(RUNTESTFLAGS)
@@ -179,7 +183,7 @@ BASE1_FILES = $(patsubst $(srcdir)/%,%,$(wildcard $(srcdir)/gdb.base/[a-m]*.exp)
BASE2_FILES = $(patsubst $(srcdir)/%,%,$(wildcard $(srcdir)/gdb.base/[n-z]*.exp))
# Handle each half of gdb.base.
-check-gdb.base%: all site.exp
+check-gdb.base%: all $(abs_builddir)/site.exp
@if test ! -d gdb.base$*; then mkdir gdb.base$*; fi
$(DO_RUNTEST) $(BASE$*_FILES) --outdir gdb.base$* $(RUNTESTFLAGS)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-09 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-09 12:15 Jan Kratochvil
2009-11-09 15:37 ` Tom Tromey
2009-11-09 17:20 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2009-11-09 17:32 ` Tom Tromey
2009-11-09 18:00 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-11-09 17:33 ` Doug Evans
2009-11-09 17:50 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-11-09 17:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-11-09 16:38 ` Doug Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091109171950.GA6665@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox