Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,  dje@google.com
Subject: Re: [patch] Allow gdbserver to dynamically lookup libthread_db.so.1
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200910070044.24367.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0910061608w4d5d2697vbb1b23138f7d95be@mail.gmail.com>

On Wednesday 07 October 2009 00:08:36, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> > I take it you only care for extended-remote?  How is the user
> > supposed to tweak the new setting with plain remote?
> 
> Note that default search path is initialized from LIBTHREAD_DB_SEARCH_PATH.
> 
> The user is expected to set this to appropriate system-specific default if
> the standard loader search path is inappropriate.

Okay.  Something like a command line option would be more user
friendly, but if you don't need it, it's fine to leave that out
until someone does.

On Wednesday 07 October 2009 00:08:36, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> If we can find '-lthread_db', '/lib/libthread_db.so.1' or
> '$prefix/lib/libthread_db.so.1', then we switch on using libthread_db and
> use '-ldl' to dynamically load it.
> 
> Perhaps a better fix is to skip this check altogether, and always use
> dlopen on Linux?

I guess your patch's already doing that.  You mean always use -dl.  Yes,
let's do that.  That's how a linux gdb is built too.

I can't look at the whole patch right now, but a quick skim
looked good.  I noticed this:

+void
+thread_db_handle_monitor_command (char *mon)
+{
+  if (strncmp (mon, "set libthread-db-search-path", 28) == 0)
+    {
+      const char *cp = mon + 28;
+
+      if (libthread_db_search_path != NULL)
+       free (libthread_db_search_path);
+
+      /* Skip leading space (if any).  */
+      while (isspace (*cp))
+       ++cp;
+
+      libthread_db_search_path = xstrdup (cp);
+
+      monitor_output ("libthread-db-search-path set to `");
+      monitor_output (libthread_db_search_path);
+      monitor_output ("'\n");
+    }
+  else
+    handle_monitor_command (mon);
+}

Could you tweak the interface a bit, to return a boolean indicating
if the command was handled or not?  E.g.,

+int
+thread_db_handle_monitor_command (char *mon)
+{
+  if (strncmp (mon, "set libthread-db-search-path", 28) == 0)
+    {
+      const char *cp = mon + 28;
+
+      if (libthread_db_search_path != NULL)
+       free (libthread_db_search_path);
+
+      /* Skip leading space (if any).  */
+      while (isspace (*cp))
+       ++cp;
+
+      libthread_db_search_path = xstrdup (cp);
+
+      monitor_output ("libthread-db-search-path set to `");
+      monitor_output (libthread_db_search_path);
+      monitor_output ("'\n");
+      return 1;
+    }
+
+    return 0;
+}

Then this allows chaining handlers, and, only server.c needs to call
handle_monitor_command if nothing handled the command.  Might want to
force a whitespace after "set libthread-db-search-path", so that
"set libthread-db-search-pathfoofoo" isn't accepted while at it.

-- 
Pedro Alves


  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-06 23:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-02 16:34 Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-02 16:43 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-02 16:47 ` Pedro Alves
2009-09-02 17:16   ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-02 17:19     ` Doug Evans
2009-10-02 23:51     ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-04 20:32       ` Pedro Alves
2009-10-05  1:49         ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-05  3:03           ` Pedro Alves
2009-10-13 13:53             ` Pedro Alves
2009-10-06 23:08         ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-06 23:44           ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2009-10-07  0:27             ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-08 18:08               ` Pedro Alves
2009-10-08 19:05                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-10-08 19:21                   ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-08 19:42                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-10-16  0:41                       ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-22 21:03                         ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-29 16:52                           ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-29 17:27                             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-10-29 17:45                               ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-08 19:36                 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-08 22:58                   ` Pedro Alves
2009-10-04 20:34       ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200910070044.24367.pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=dje@google.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=ppluzhnikov@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox