Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: pedro@codesourcery.com (Pedro Alves)
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, drow@false.org (Daniel Jacobowitz),
	        mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl (Mark Kettenis),
	brobecker@adacore.com,         teawater@gmail.com,
	msnyder@vmware.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Check solib bfd arch
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:14:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909181614.n8IGEWWB006667@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909181553.45603.pedro@codesourcery.com> from "Pedro Alves" at Sep 18, 2009 03:53:43 PM

Pedro Alves wrote:

> Could we compare the solib's target arch with
> tdesc_architecture(target_read_description()) directly --- but only
> if available ---, instead of comparing it with target_gdbarch?

Hmm, this would ignore the work done by choose_architecture_for_target.

Maybe we should compare against target_gdbarch, but only if a target
description is present?  Just wrap the whole test as-is in a 
  if (target_read_description ())
    ...

In any case, at this point the best option for 7.0 might indeed be
to just disable the test.

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-18 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-03  9:52 Hui Zhu
2009-07-05 21:36 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-07-06  3:03   ` Hui Zhu
2009-07-07 16:45     ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-07-08  2:46       ` Hui Zhu
2009-07-09 13:43         ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-07-09 16:50           ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-17 22:56         ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-18  5:05           ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-18 12:50           ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-18 13:06             ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-18 13:10             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-09-18 14:24               ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-18 14:08             ` Mark Kettenis
2009-09-18 14:11               ` Mark Kettenis
2009-09-18 14:39               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-09-18 14:53                 ` Pedro Alves
2009-09-18 16:14                   ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2009-09-18 16:25                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-09-18 16:41                       ` Pedro Alves
2009-09-18 16:44                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-09-18 16:45                         ` Pedro Alves
2009-09-18 17:17                           ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-18 20:43                             ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-22 23:04           ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200909181614.n8IGEWWB006667@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com \
    --to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
    --cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=teawater@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox