From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Emi SUZUKI <emi-suzuki@tjsys.co.jp>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Watchpoint on an unloaded shared library(1)
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081213150517.GE6866@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081120.210657.01365938.emi-suzuki@tjsys.co.jp>
Emi,
Thanks for sending this patch.
> 2008-11-20 Emi Suzuki <emi-suzuki@tjsys.co.jp>
>
> * breakpoint.c (do_enable_breakpoint): Inform the user and
> return from the function if the expression of a watchpoint is
> invalid and cannot be updated.
How about replace all the code that's inside
if (bpt->type == bp_watchpoint ||
bpt->type == bp_hardware_watchpoint ||
bpt->type == bp_read_watchpoint ||
bpt->type == bp_access_watchpoint)
{
[re-create a lot of stuff for our watchpoint...]
by a call to update_watchpoint (bpt, 1)? Would that work in your case?
When I looked at what update_watchpoint does and what do_enable_breakpoint
does for watchpoints, it seemed to me that do_enable_breakpoint was trying
to do the same, except that it was missing a few pieces. Does anybody see
a reason for the code almost-duplication here?
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-13 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-20 18:25 Emi SUZUKI
2008-12-13 15:06 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2008-12-16 12:16 ` Emi SUZUKI
2008-12-21 13:11 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-12-22 3:28 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-12-25 11:28 ` Emi SUZUKI
2008-12-26 6:11 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-12-26 7:09 ` Emi SUZUKI
2008-12-28 11:48 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-01-06 1:47 ` Emi SUZUKI
2009-01-06 4:28 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-01-06 5:16 ` Emi SUZUKI
2009-01-08 4:02 ` [commit] " Emi SUZUKI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081213150517.GE6866@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=emi-suzuki@tjsys.co.jp \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox