From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Resubmit process record and replay, 7/10
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811200240.47107.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daef60380811160023ne49a1ebt60058c5348dc4bc4@mail.gmail.com>
My 2c.,
On Sunday 16 November 2008 08:23:12, teawater wrote:
> --- a/linux-nat.c
> +++ b/linux-nat.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@
> #include "event-loop.h"
> #include "event-top.h"
>
> +#include "record.h"
> +
> #ifdef HAVE_PERSONALITY
> # include <sys/personality.h>
> # if !HAVE_DECL_ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE
> @@ -518,6 +520,115 @@ my_waitpid (int pid, int *status, int fl
> return ret;
> }
>
Can you please try moving all this blob...
> +extern struct bp_location *bp_location_chain;
> +static struct lwp_info * find_lwp_pid (ptid_t ptid);
> +static int
> +my_waitpid_record (int pid, int *status, int flags)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct bp_location *bl;
> + struct breakpoint *b;
> + CORE_ADDR pc;
> + CORE_ADDR decr_pc_after_break;
> + struct lwp_info *lp;
> + int is_breakpoint = 1;
> +
> +wait_begin:
> + ret = my_waitpid (pid, status, flags);
> + if (ret == -1)
> + {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (ret == 0)
> + {
> + goto wait_begin;
> + }
> +
> + if (WIFSTOPPED (*status) && WSTOPSIG (*status) == SIGTRAP)
> + {
> + /* Check if there is a breakpoint. */
> + pc = 0;
> + registers_changed ();
> + for (bl = bp_location_chain; bl; bl = bl->global_next)
> + {
> + b = bl->owner;
> + gdb_assert (b);
> + if (b->enable_state != bp_enabled
> + && b->enable_state != bp_permanent)
> + continue;
> + if (!pc)
> + {
> + pc = regcache_read_pc (get_thread_regcache (pid_to_ptid (ret)));
> + }
> + switch (b->type)
> + {
> + default:
> + if (bl->address == pc)
> + {
> + goto out;
> + }
> + break;
> +
> + case bp_watchpoint:
> + /*XXX teawater: I still not very clear how to deal with it. */
> + goto out;
> + break;
> +
> + case bp_catchpoint:
> + gdb_assert (b->ops != NULL && b->ops->breakpoint_hit != NULL);
> + if (b->ops->breakpoint_hit (b))
> + {
> + goto out;
> + }
> + break;
> +
> + case bp_hardware_watchpoint:
> + case bp_read_watchpoint:
> + case bp_access_watchpoint:
> + if (STOPPED_BY_WATCHPOINT (0))
> + {
> + goto out;
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + lp = find_lwp_pid (pid_to_ptid (ret));
> + if (lp)
> + lp->stopped = 1;
> +
> + /* record message */
> + record_message (current_gdbarch);
> +
> + /* resume program */
> + linux_ops->to_resume (pid_to_ptid (ret), 1, TARGET_SIGNAL_0);
> + goto wait_begin;
> + }
> +
> + is_breakpoint = 0;
> +
> +out:
> + /* Add gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break to pc because pc will be break at address
> + add gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break when inferior non-step execute. */
> + if (is_breakpoint)
> + {
> + decr_pc_after_break = gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break
> + (get_regcache_arch (get_thread_regcache (pid_to_ptid (ret))));
> + if (decr_pc_after_break)
> + {
> + if (!pc)
> + {
> + pc = regcache_read_pc (get_thread_regcache (pid_to_ptid (ret)));
> + }
> + regcache_write_pc (get_thread_regcache (pid_to_ptid (ret)),
> + pc + decr_pc_after_break);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
... to the record target? It seems to be interested in getting
*all* events, instead of letting linux_nat_wait filter some.
> /* Determine if PTRACE_O_TRACEFORK can be used to follow fork events.
>
> First, we try to enable fork tracing on ORIGINAL_PID. If this fails,
> @@ -2876,7 +2987,16 @@ retry:
> queued events. */
> lwpid = queued_waitpid (pid, &status, options);
> else
> - lwpid = my_waitpid (pid, &status, options);
> + {
> + if (RECORD_IS_USED && !record_resume_step)
> + {
> + lwpid = my_waitpid_record (pid, &status, options);
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + lwpid = my_waitpid (pid, &status, options);
> + }
> + }
>
Could you do it by instead of calling my_waitpid_record here, make
sure that whatever comes out of my_waitpid results in returning from
linux_nat_wait?
Ideally, we should have a flags parameter in target_wait, like:
-ptid_t target_wait (ptid_t, struct target_waitstatus *);
+ptid_t target_wait (ptid_t, struct target_waitstatus *, int target_flags);
... process record would pass a special flag to
linux_nat_wait for this, but I'd be happy if you tried moving
most of the code to the record target, and kept using RECORD_IS_USED,
as I hinted at in another message a new target_is_recording_p () or
somesuch method.
Also, it seems most of the breakpoint checking code should be replaced
by one of the breakpoint_here style predicates exported by breakpoint.h.
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-20 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-17 2:35 teawater
2008-11-20 5:12 ` Michael Snyder
2008-11-20 15:19 ` teawater
2008-11-20 8:13 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
[not found] ` <200811200250.22173.alves.ped@gmail.com>
2008-11-20 16:37 ` teawater
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200811200240.47107.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=teawater@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox