Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
		Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>,
		gdb-patches ml <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc] expose gdb values to python
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 22:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081004222055.GA7541@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3ljx8l5cf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 09:09:36AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Joel> Better yet, I would love for the object to have one attribute
> Joel> for each component that I could simply access using X.baz.
> Joel> But I suspect that there is no way we can implement that without
> Joel> having to compute the value of each component, which would be
> Joel> quite wastful the vast majority of the time. Sigh, is it not
> Joel> possible to lazy-initialize attributes?
> 
> I think we can do this, but there is a cost, namely conflicts between
> methods on Value and field names in the inferior will have to be
> resolved in favor of the method.  So, robust programs will always have
> to use the [] syntax anyway.

WDYT about making this work anyway - and using a documented namespace
for any methods we add?  Then the common case will be able to use the
attributes safely.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-10-04 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-12  6:05 Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-09-20 21:29 ` Tom Tromey
2008-09-21  4:27   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-25  4:33     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-09-25 11:47       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-26  2:00         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-09-26  9:30           ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-09-28  1:19             ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-09-28 18:19               ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-09-29 16:16                 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-09-29 17:00                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-30  4:07                     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-09-30 12:41                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-01  3:18                         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-10-01 11:40                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-29 18:52                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-09-26 20:57           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-01  5:39           ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-04 22:14             ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-09-25  4:49   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-09-26 23:08     ` Tom Tromey
2008-10-01  5:48   ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-01 15:12     ` Tom Tromey
2008-10-01 16:04       ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-04 22:21       ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2008-10-05  0:00         ` Tom Tromey
2008-10-06 18:49           ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-06 21:15           ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081004222055.GA7541@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=bauerman@br.ibm.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox