From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] Remove unnecessary target defaults.
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:02:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808151902.07713.vladimir@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200808151552.19945.pedro@codesourcery.com>
On Friday 15 August 2008 18:52:19 Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Friday 15 August 2008 15:40:53, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>
> > > It sounds sound to me. This would be like a generalised version of
> > > inf-child.c, from which all targets that can have execution
> > > inherit.
> >
> > Well, actually, I meant implementing target_can_async_p in such a way that
> > it:
> >
> > - iterates over all targets
> > - breaks after it examines a target at process stratum
> >
>
> Should work too...
>
> > Of course, we can also have a common target, but it would require manually
> > adjusting all target on process stratum.
>
> ... yeah. I keep meaning to try adding a base target from which all
> targets inherit, so we could perhaps get rid of this INHERIT +
> de_fault business, and I somehow thought you could read minds. Well,
> you do, but you set it to block dumb ideas. :-)
In fact, I cannot shake the feeling that current target stack is several
designs lumped together, and it would be beneficial to switch to a more coherent
design, where, in particular:
- there's base target every other target derives from and most methods of the base
target forward to the target beneath
- dummy target catches all methods
- all INHERIT and de_fault code is removed
- all target_xxx methods (iterating over target stack) are removed, or make just call
current_target->xxx
But this is fairly large thing to do.
- Volodya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-15 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-15 12:46 Vladimir Prus
2008-08-15 13:08 ` Pedro Alves
2008-08-15 14:16 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-08-15 14:31 ` Pedro Alves
2008-08-15 14:41 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-08-15 14:52 ` Pedro Alves
2008-08-15 15:02 ` Vladimir Prus [this message]
2008-08-15 15:11 ` Pedro Alves
2008-08-16 20:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200808151902.07713.vladimir@codesourcery.com \
--to=vladimir@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox