Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: drow@false.org (Daniel Jacobowitz)
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [gdbserver] Problems trying to resume dead threads
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:25:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808041823.m74INFCJ008291@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080804134000.GA17925@caradoc.them.org> from "Daniel Jacobowitz" at Aug 04, 2008 09:40:00 AM

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> I can reproduce this problem by using the binary from killed.exp and
> running strace on gdbserver.  I can also reproduce it on an embedded
> ARM target by running killed.exp.  I can't reproduce it on my desktop
> running killed.exp, which suggests this is normally hidden by
> scheduler decisions - you need a long enough gap between the two
> PTRACE_CONT's.
> 
> What do you think of this change?  Ideally, we could wait with WNOHANG
> at this point to check for the exit case, but we'd have to restructure
> a bit of the event loop to handle pending status == exited.

Hmm, still fails with my Cell test case like this:
writing register 25: No such process
ptrace(regsets_fetch_inferior_registers) PID=14241: No such process
reading register 0: No such process

The initial error happens in usr_store_inferior_registers called via
the regcache_invalidate_one call in linux_resume_one_process, just 
before the location you modified.  Whether this writes anything 
probably depends on target properties like decr_pc_after_break ...
Ignoring ESRCH in usr_store_inferior_registers as well seems to 
fix the problem for me.

In any case, I'm not sure why usr_store_inferior_registers errors
out ... the parallel regsets_store_inferior_registers only gives
a warning in this case.

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-04 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-19 17:17 Ulrich Weigand
2008-08-04 13:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-08-04 18:25   ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2008-08-04 18:30     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-08-04 19:46       ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-08-04 19:55         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-08-05 21:06           ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-08-05 21:59             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-08-05 22:15               ` Ulrich Weigand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200808041823.m74INFCJ008291@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com \
    --to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox