From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: Fix Ericsson DICOS inferior function calls
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807091648.10557.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200807072256.m67MuLP2010832@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 436 bytes --]
Hi Mark,
On Monday 07 July 2008 23:56:21, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> I think we should get rid of generic_push_dummy_code(), and instead
> require that each target that puts the dummy breakpoint on the stack
> provides its own push_dummy_code() function. Could you provide one
> for DICOS?
Something like this?
It looks like the only other target that uses ON_STACK and doesn't
define a push_dummy_code is spu-tdep.c.
--
Pedro Alves
[-- Attachment #2: dicos_push_dummy_code.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1930 bytes --]
2008-07-09 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
* i386-dicos-tdep.c (i386_dicos_frame_align): Delete.
(i386_dicos_push_dummy_code): New.
(i386_dicos_init_abi): Don't register i386_dicos_frame_align.
Register i386_dicos_push_dummy_code.
---
gdb/i386-dicos-tdep.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Index: src/gdb/i386-dicos-tdep.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/i386-dicos-tdep.c 2008-07-09 00:33:38.000000000 +0100
+++ src/gdb/i386-dicos-tdep.c 2008-07-09 00:41:36.000000000 +0100
@@ -25,14 +25,21 @@
#include "inferior.h"
static CORE_ADDR
-i386_dicos_frame_align (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR sp)
+i386_dicos_push_dummy_code (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
+ CORE_ADDR sp, CORE_ADDR funaddr,
+ struct value **args, int nargs,
+ struct type *value_type,
+ CORE_ADDR *real_pc, CORE_ADDR *bp_addr,
+ struct regcache *regcache)
{
- /* Having a call dummy on the stack requires a gdbarch_frame_align
- method to align the breakpoint instruction in the stack.
- Strictly speaking, we could just return SP pristine on x86. But,
- as long as we're providing a frame align method, might as well
- align for efficiency. */
- return sp & -(CORE_ADDR)16;
+ int bplen;
+ CORE_ADDR bppc = sp;
+
+ gdbarch_breakpoint_from_pc (gdbarch, &bppc, &bplen);
+ *bp_addr = sp - bplen;
+ *real_pc = funaddr;
+
+ return *bp_addr;
}
static void
@@ -46,7 +53,7 @@ i386_dicos_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info
text location we could find with a symbol where to place the call
dummy, so we put it on the stack. */
set_gdbarch_call_dummy_location (gdbarch, ON_STACK);
- set_gdbarch_frame_align (gdbarch, i386_dicos_frame_align);
+ set_gdbarch_push_dummy_code (gdbarch, i386_dicos_push_dummy_code);
}
/* Look in the elf symbol table of ABFD for a symbol named WANTED.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-09 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-07 22:10 Pedro Alves
2008-07-07 22:59 ` Mark Kettenis
2008-07-07 23:36 ` Pedro Alves
2008-07-09 15:48 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2008-07-14 15:10 ` Mark Kettenis
2008-07-14 18:09 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200807091648.10557.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox