Hi Mark,

On Monday 07 July 2008 23:56:21, Mark Kettenis wrote:

> I think we should get rid of generic_push_dummy_code(), and instead
> require that each target that puts the dummy breakpoint on the stack
> provides its own push_dummy_code() function.  Could you provide one
> for DICOS?

Something like this?

It looks like the only other target that uses ON_STACK and doesn't
define a push_dummy_code is spu-tdep.c.

-- 
Pedro Alves