[patch] Fix instable results on dfp-test.exp

[patch] Fix instable results on dfp-test.exp

[Jan Kratochvil]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 89 bytes --]

Hi,

one uncaught prompt causing FAILs when GDB underneath runs too slow.


Regards,
Jan

[-- Attachment #2: gdb-cvs-dfp-test-stable.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2551 bytes --]

2008-05-03  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>

	* gdb.base/dfp-test.exp: Fix random FAIL risk on calling functions.

--- ./gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dfp-test.exp	30 Jan 2008 03:19:26 -0000	1.5
+++ ./gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dfp-test.exp	3 May 2008 21:25:34 -0000
@@ -252,16 +252,16 @@ gdb_test "backtrace" ".*arg0_128 \\(arg0
 
 # Test calling inferior function with DFP arguments or return value.
 
-send_gdb "call arg0_32 (1.2df, 2.2df, 3.2df, 4.2df, 5.2df, 6.2df)\n"
-gdb_test "backtrace 1" "\n#\[0-9\]+  arg0_32 \\(arg0=1.2, arg1=2.2, arg2=3.2, arg3=4.2, arg4=5.2, arg5=6.2\\).*" "Call function with correct _Decimal32 arguments."
+gdb_test "call arg0_32 (1.2df, 2.2df, 3.2df, 4.2df, 5.2df, 6.2df)" "Breakpoint.*arg0_32.*" "Call function with correct _Decimal32 arguments."
+gdb_test "backtrace 1" "\n#\[0-9\]+  arg0_32 \\(arg0=1.2, arg1=2.2, arg2=3.2, arg3=4.2, arg4=5.2, arg5=6.2\\).*" "Backtrace function with correct _Decimal32 arguments."
 gdb_test "finish" " = 1.2" "Correct _Decimal32 return value from called function."
 
-send_gdb "call arg0_64 (1.2dd, 2.2dd, 3.2dd, 4.2dd, 5.2dd, 6.2dd)\n"
-gdb_test "backtrace 1" "\n#\[0-9\]+  arg0_64 \\(arg0=1.2, arg1=2.2, arg2=3.2, arg3=4.2, arg4=5.2, arg5=6.2\\).*" "Call function with correct _Decimal64 arguments."
+gdb_test "call arg0_64 (1.2dd, 2.2dd, 3.2dd, 4.2dd, 5.2dd, 6.2dd)" "Breakpoint.*arg0_64.*" "Call function with correct _Decimal64 arguments."
+gdb_test "backtrace 1" "\n#\[0-9\]+  arg0_64 \\(arg0=1.2, arg1=2.2, arg2=3.2, arg3=4.2, arg4=5.2, arg5=6.2\\).*" "Backtrace function with correct _Decimal64 arguments."
 gdb_test "finish" " = 1.2" "Correct _Decimal64 return value from called function."
 
-send_gdb "call arg0_128 (1.2dl, 2.2dl, 3.2dl, 4.2dl, 5.2dl, 6.2dl)\n"
-gdb_test "backtrace 1" "\n#\[0-9\]+  arg0_128 \\(arg0=1.2, arg1=2.2, arg2=3.2, arg3=4.2, arg4=5.2, arg5=6.2\\).*" "Call function with correct _Decimal128 arguments."
+gdb_test "call arg0_128 (1.2dl, 2.2dl, 3.2dl, 4.2dl, 5.2dl, 6.2dl)" "Breakpoint.*arg0_128.*" "Call function with correct _Decimal128 arguments."
+gdb_test "backtrace 1" "\n#\[0-9\]+  arg0_128 \\(arg0=1.2, arg1=2.2, arg2=3.2, arg3=4.2, arg4=5.2, arg5=6.2\\).*" "Backtrace function with correct _Decimal128 arguments."
 gdb_test "finish" " = 1.2" "Correct _Decimal128 return value from called function."
 
 gdb_test "call decimal_dec128_align (double_val1, dec128_val2, double_val3, double_val4, double_val5, double_val6, double_val7, double_val8, double_val9, double_val10, double_val11, double_val12, double_val13, double_val14)" " = 1" \

Re: [patch] Fix instable results on dfp-test.exp

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 11:31:43PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> 2008-05-03  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> 
> 	* gdb.base/dfp-test.exp: Fix random FAIL risk on calling functions.

OK, thanks.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Re: [patch] Fix instable results on dfp-test.exp

[Thiago Jung Bauermann]

On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 23:31 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> one uncaught prompt causing FAILs when GDB underneath runs too slow.

Thanks for the fix.
-- 
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center