From: "André Pönitz" <apoenitz@trolltech.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH:MI] Return a subset of a variable object's children
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804301100.21674.apoenitz@trolltech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fv93ar$bmh$1@ger.gmane.org>
On Wednesday 30 April 2008 08:24:30 Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Nick Roberts wrote:
> > [...]
> > I was thinking that only a small number of children would ever exist
> > simultaneously. Scrolling might make that a larger number but maybe
> > it could be arranged to delete children that go out of view.
>
> I wonder if deleting children that are not visible is possible/desirable.
Well, I would still prefer a simple toggle that would allow me to switch off
any automatic creation of children and one-shot 'expression evaluation'
and one-shot 'children listing'.
I would expect this to be much simpler to implement on the gdb side and
gives all the flexibility needed (as far as I am concerned) on the
frontend side.
Complex containers may do all kind of funny stuff behind the debugger's
back (like reallocation, rebalancing, renumbering, moving stuff to and from
secondary memory) which a frontend might want to handle transparently.
I would not expect gdb to even be aware of that (let alone to handle(!) it).
Also, hard-wiring behaviour to certain types calls for trouble on the
frontend side. E.g. if there's a std::string member somewhere I might want
to see it as something "human readable" (-> 1 child), or a byte array
(->lots of children), or maybe a structured view if it is XML (-> some children).
So whatever behaviour is hard-wired will be wrong for n - 1 use cases.
Regards,
Andre'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-30 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-27 15:34 Nick Roberts
2008-04-29 15:58 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-04-30 7:02 ` Nick Roberts
2008-04-30 9:20 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-04-30 9:25 ` Nick Roberts
2008-04-30 9:39 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-04-30 16:29 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-05-01 15:56 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-05-01 17:29 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-05-01 12:15 ` Nick Roberts
2008-05-10 14:45 ` Nick Roberts
2008-05-28 19:15 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-05-29 12:01 ` Nick Roberts
2008-04-30 16:22 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-05-01 15:54 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-05-01 18:14 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-05-01 18:40 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-05-01 20:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-01 23:38 ` Nick Roberts
2008-05-02 0:58 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-05-11 17:45 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-04-30 10:47 ` André Pönitz [this message]
2008-04-30 12:20 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-04-30 12:53 ` André Pönitz
2008-04-30 13:11 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-04-30 12:44 ` Nick Roberts
[not found] ` <200804301244.55116.apoenitz@trolltech.com>
2008-04-30 13:16 ` André Pönitz
2008-05-01 6:27 ` Nick Roberts
2008-05-05 11:46 ` André Pönitz
2008-04-30 14:59 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-05-01 12:06 ` Nick Roberts
2008-05-01 14:22 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-05-01 20:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-30 8:59 ` Vladimir Prus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200804301100.21674.apoenitz@trolltech.com \
--to=apoenitz@trolltech.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox