Re: [patch] fix for PR2424

[Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>]

On Wednesday 23 April 2008 17:43:41 Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
> > 
> >> NOTE3: In mi-support.exp (mi_expect_stop), I put argument "after_reason"
> to
> >> be
> >> after the reason
> > 
> > Why? Neither your email nor changelog entry fail to explain the motivation
> > for the change.
> > 
> 
> The field is named "after_reason" and it hadn't been used. It looked like
> someone meant to use it for after reason field, but was placed after
> 'thread-id' field - I might have made wrong conclusion, this is why I
> emphasised the change in the note above.
> 
> It is a local variable so it should not be a problem to switch it back, add
> new param for 'disp' field or whatever.

I see. I did not realize that this variable is actually used *after* your patch,
so wondered why changing a variable if it has no effect. So far, except for 
a couple of conflicts, I did not run into any issues with this change.

Thanks for explaining,
Volodya