Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>, Doug Evans <dje@google.com>,
	        GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
	mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix Linux attach to signalled/stopped processes
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:37:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080410153017.GA4814@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080410151545.GC21662@caradoc.them.org>

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:15:45 +0200, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 03:49:36PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
...
> > As a gdb user, I have long been annoyed by the behavior on attaching to a
> > stopped process.  What I want is for attach to complete immediately and let
> > me examine the process.  If I then "cont", the process should go back to
> > what it was doing--sitting in job control stop.  Then fg or otherwise
> > sending SIGCONT will wake it up normally, and gdb should stop and tell me
> > about the SIGCONT like normal.
> 
> How could GDB put an attached process back into job control stop?

ptrace (PTRACE_DETACH, child_pid, NULL, (void *) (long) SIGSTOP);

It is being done by the patch (in the appropriate cases)
	http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/rpms/gdb/devel/gdb-6.7-bz233852-attach-signalled-fix.patch
	(this patch does not follow the Roland's suggested behavior)

The current GDB code already interprets the DETACH_COMMAND ARGS parameter as
the signal number for PTRACE_DETACH but one cannot enter any arguments for the
`detach' command by the cli interface.


Regards,
Jan


  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-10 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-31 22:07 Doug Evans
2008-04-02  0:01 ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-04-02  0:07   ` Roland McGrath
2008-04-10 15:30     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-10 15:37       ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2008-04-10 15:49         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-10 16:00           ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-04-10 19:59             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-10 15:39   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-10 16:00     ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-04-10 19:48       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-11  8:46       ` Roland McGrath
2008-04-11 17:46         ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-04-11 19:01           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-12  7:58           ` Roland McGrath
2008-04-14 15:09             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-14 15:31               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-15 22:14                 ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-05-01 18:50                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-05  8:48                     ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-07-05 13:48                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-24 12:46                 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-09-26  3:52                   ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-09-26 13:00                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-28 11:43                       ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-09-28 14:58                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-15  8:14               ` Roland McGrath
2008-04-15 13:02                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-16  7:01                   ` Roland McGrath
2008-04-11 22:20         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-11 22:21           ` Pedro Alves
2008-04-11 22:25             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-12  0:02               ` Pedro Alves
2008-04-12  0:19                 ` Pedro Alves
2008-04-13  9:35                   ` Pedro Alves
2008-04-13 13:40                     ` Pedro Alves
2008-04-12 16:38           ` Roland McGrath
2008-04-12 16:43           ` Eli Zaretskii
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-06 14:34 Jan Kratochvil
2007-06-11 13:44 ` Jan Kratochvil
2007-06-15 18:02 ` Mark Kettenis
2007-06-26 22:40   ` Jan Kratochvil
2007-06-27  0:13     ` Mark Kettenis
2007-06-27 11:59       ` Jan Kratochvil
2007-06-27 18:30         ` Mark Kettenis
2007-06-30 11:45         ` Jan Kratochvil
2007-06-30 11:57           ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-06-30 17:15             ` Jan Kratochvil
2007-06-30 18:52               ` Eli Zaretskii
     [not found]               ` <200706301852.l5UIq8ek010536@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
2007-07-01  3:17                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-07-01  9:34                   ` Mark Kettenis
2007-07-01 10:03                     ` Jan Kratochvil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080410153017.GA4814@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net \
    --to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=dje@google.com \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox