Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: eliz@gnu.org
Cc: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com,
	        gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix Linux attach to signalled/stopped processes
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200707010934.l619Y54T008830@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uzm2glsms.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 01 	Jul 2007 06:17:31 +0300)

> Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 06:17:31 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> 
> > Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 20:52:08 +0200 (CEST)
> > From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
> > CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org
> > 
> > > +* Stopped processes may get attached now.  Signals being delivered at the time
> > > +of the attach command no longer get lost.
> > > +
> > >  * New commands
> > 
> > I don't think this is newsworthy.
> 
> I do.
> 
> > At the very least this is misleading.  This always was supposed to
> > work.  And it does on most operating systems.  I'm pretty sure it
> > worked on Linux too in the past.
> 
> Then all we need is a trivial change like this:
> 
>  On GNU/Linux, stopped processes may get attached now.  Signals being
>  delivered at the time of the attach command no longer get lost.

Fine with me.


  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-01  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-06 14:34 Jan Kratochvil
2007-06-11 13:44 ` Jan Kratochvil
2007-06-15 18:02 ` Mark Kettenis
2007-06-26 22:40   ` Jan Kratochvil
2007-06-27  0:13     ` Mark Kettenis
2007-06-27 11:59       ` Jan Kratochvil
2007-06-27 18:30         ` Mark Kettenis
2007-06-30 11:45         ` Jan Kratochvil
2007-06-30 11:57           ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-06-30 17:15             ` Jan Kratochvil
2007-06-30 18:52               ` Eli Zaretskii
     [not found]               ` <200706301852.l5UIq8ek010536@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
2007-07-01  3:17                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-07-01  9:34                   ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2007-07-01 10:03                     ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-03-31 22:07 Doug Evans
2008-04-02  0:01 ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-04-02  0:07   ` Roland McGrath
2008-04-10 15:30     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-10 15:37       ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-04-10 15:49         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-10 16:00           ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-04-10 19:59             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-10 15:39   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-10 16:00     ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-04-10 19:48       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-11  8:46       ` Roland McGrath
2008-04-11 17:46         ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-04-11 19:01           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-12  7:58           ` Roland McGrath
2008-04-14 15:09             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-14 15:31               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-15 22:14                 ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-05-01 18:50                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-05  8:48                     ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-07-05 13:48                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-24 12:46                 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-09-26  3:52                   ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-09-26 13:00                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-28 11:43                       ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-09-28 14:58                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-15  8:14               ` Roland McGrath
2008-04-15 13:02                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-16  7:01                   ` Roland McGrath
2008-04-11 22:20         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-11 22:21           ` Pedro Alves
2008-04-11 22:25             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-12  0:02               ` Pedro Alves
2008-04-12  0:19                 ` Pedro Alves
2008-04-13  9:35                   ` Pedro Alves
2008-04-13 13:40                     ` Pedro Alves
2008-04-12 16:38           ` Roland McGrath
2008-04-12 16:43           ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200707010934.l619Y54T008830@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
    --to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox