From: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Document fixed/floating variable objects and thread-id.
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 22:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804100105.31748.ghost@cs.msu.su> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uzls2agzy.fsf@gnu.org>
On Thursday 10 April 2008 00:52:01 Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
> > Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 21:47:35 +0400
> > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> >
> > > Then how about ``the values of variables whose names appear in the
> > > expressions are re-evaluated every time''?
> >
> > I'm afraid that this statement is true for fixed variable objects too,
> > and it still makes it sound like we pick variables, and then reevaluate it.
> > Instead, we reparse entire expression which can find completely different
> > variables.
>
> Well, I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean. Please show me an
> example where reparsing an expression would yield something different
> each time.
void foo (int i)
{
...
}
void bar (int i)
{
...
}
If you create a fixed varobj in 'bar', then each time you updating, new value of
bar's i will be read. If you create a floating varobj in 'bar', then if you update
it while still in bar, new value of bar's i will be read. If you update it in foo,
then the value of foo's i will be used.
So while for fixed varobj's update fetches new value of 'i', for floating varobjs
we also decide which 'i' to use each time.
- Volodya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-09 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-04 9:32 Vladimir Prus
2008-04-04 11:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-04-09 13:49 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-04-09 15:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-04-09 17:06 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-04-09 18:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-04-09 20:37 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-04-09 21:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-04-09 22:17 ` Vladimir Prus [this message]
2008-04-23 11:52 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-04-23 18:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-04-26 17:44 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-04-26 18:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-04-04 13:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-04 13:44 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200804100105.31748.ghost@cs.msu.su \
--to=ghost@cs.msu.su \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox