Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Document fixed/floating variable objects and thread-id.
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 22:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804100105.31748.ghost@cs.msu.su> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uzls2agzy.fsf@gnu.org>

On Thursday 10 April 2008 00:52:01 Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
> > Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 21:47:35 +0400
> > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> > 
> > > Then how about ``the values of variables whose names appear in the
> > > expressions are re-evaluated every time''?
> > 
> > I'm afraid that this statement is true for fixed variable objects too,
> > and it still makes it sound like we pick variables, and then reevaluate it.
> > Instead, we reparse entire expression which can find completely different
> > variables.
> 
> Well, I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean.  Please show me an
> example where reparsing an expression would yield something different
> each time.

void foo (int i)
{
	...
}

void bar (int i)
{
	...
}


If you create a fixed varobj in 'bar', then each time you updating, new value of
bar's i will be read. If you create a floating varobj in 'bar', then if you update
it while still in bar, new value of bar's i will be read. If you update it in foo,
then the value of foo's i will be used. 

So while for fixed varobj's update fetches new value of 'i', for floating varobjs
we also decide which 'i' to use each time.

- Volodya


  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-09 21:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-04  9:32 Vladimir Prus
2008-04-04 11:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-04-09 13:49   ` Vladimir Prus
2008-04-09 15:21     ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-04-09 17:06       ` Vladimir Prus
2008-04-09 18:04         ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-04-09 20:37           ` Vladimir Prus
2008-04-09 21:25             ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-04-09 22:17               ` Vladimir Prus [this message]
2008-04-23 11:52                 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-04-23 18:00                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-04-26 17:44                     ` Vladimir Prus
2008-04-26 18:45                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-04-04 13:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-04 13:44 ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200804100105.31748.ghost@cs.msu.su \
    --to=ghost@cs.msu.su \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox