From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Markus Deuling <deuling@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] new set/show multiple-choice-auto-select commands
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:20:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080116101939.GA28020@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <478DB261.5020807@de.ibm.com>
> >The principle is indeed the same. The semantics of your command
> >are a little unclear to me, as you didn't say what should happen
> >if symbol-user-choice is off and you have more than one symbol matching.
> >Do you cancel the lookup, choose all symbols, and pick one at random?
>
> no, if it is set to off the default behaviour of GDB takes place. GDB
> executes the "normal" symbol lookup routines as-is now.
Actually, I was asking you to confirm what the current "normal" symbol
lookup does. AFAIK, it picks one symbol at random, which is a bug.
So my question still stands :), but the answer is not critical for
my part of the patch - we can talk about that later when you make
your own adjustments inside linespec.
> Hm, I guess it should be ok to have "on" as default. I could change
> the patch a bit so the the user menu only gets invoked if > 1 symbol
> is found and the normal lookup routines if <= 1 symbol is found.
> Then there would only be a choice if there are multiple symbols.
Absolutely. There is no point in printing a menu if there is only
one match :). You will notice that I am thinking purely in terms
of user interface at this point, I'm leaving the implementation
aspect out as an implementation detail.
> Sure, if you put your command in linespec.c and set default to "on"
> I'll rework the patch to make use of the command and invoke the user
> menu if there are > 1 symbols found.
Deal. A new patch should be sent soon.
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-16 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-01 14:36 Joel Brobecker
2008-01-01 20:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-01-02 4:35 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-01-05 11:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-01-15 9:29 ` Markus Deuling
2008-01-15 12:37 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-01-16 7:32 ` Markus Deuling
2008-01-16 10:20 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2008-01-16 10:40 ` Markus Deuling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080116101939.GA28020@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=deuling@de.ibm.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox