Re: [RFA] Inform about new thread in a single place.

[Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>]

> From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 20:09:08 +0300
> 
> We have lots of place where "[New thread XXX]" is printed.
> This patch makes add_thread responsible for that. OK?

No, there are places in the code where add_thread() is called where we
should not print the "[New thread xxx]" message.  For example in
bsd-uthread.c, where the main thread is added to the list of threads
to associate process ID and thread ID.

> 	Inform about new thread in a single place.
> 	* thread.c (add_thread): Announce new thread.
> 	* inf-ttrace.c (inf_ttrace_wait): Don't
> 	inform about new thread, as add_thread is always
> 	called too, and will take care of that.
> 	* infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Likewise.
> 	* procfs.c (procfs_wait): Likewise.
> 	* remote.c (remote_currthread): Likewise.
> 	* sol-thread.c (sol_thread_wait): Likewise.
> 	* win32-nat.c (get_win32_debug_event): Likewise.
> 	* gdb/linux-nat.c (lin_lwp_attach_lwp): Likewise.
> 	* linux-thread-db.c (attach_thread): Don't inform
> 	about new thread.  This is called only from
> 	linux-thread-db.c:attach_thread, which will take care.