Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: drow@false.org (Daniel Jacobowitz)
Cc: vladimir@codesourcery.com (Vladimir Prus), gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [2/10] Remove &builtin_type_ from tdep code         (amd64/s390/sparc64)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706131317.l5DDH90O009367@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070613131002.GA23051@caradoc.them.org> from "Daniel Jacobowitz" at Jun 13, 2007 09:10:02 AM

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 03:06:11PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > However, this macro is not fully equivalent; in particular it
> > is no longer possible to use &builtin_type_double.
> 
> You keep saying this, but is it true? :-)

Well, you can take the address, but you won't get the gdbarch-swap
effect any more.  So if you were relying on that, it'll break ...

> You can't take the address of a function's return value, but you can
> take the address of a dereference.  Of course using
> &builtin_type_double in m68k_gdbarch_init won't work since
> current_gdbarch is NULL then.  But we should be able to save
> builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_double if we wanted to, I think.

Not really, as the per-gdbarch data elements are allocated only
*after* gdbarch_init returns.  (At least those installed using
gdbarch_data_register_post_init as builtin_type is.)

So calling builtin_type (gdbarch) within m68k_gdbarch_init should
itself return NULL.

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-13 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-08 23:15 Ulrich Weigand
2007-06-12 15:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-06-12 15:57   ` Ulrich Weigand
2007-06-12 15:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-06-12 16:07   ` Ulrich Weigand
2007-06-13  7:08   ` Vladimir Prus
2007-06-13 13:06     ` Ulrich Weigand
2007-06-13 13:09       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-06-13 13:17         ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2007-06-13 13:36           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-06-13 13:57             ` Ulrich Weigand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200706131317.l5DDH90O009367@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com \
    --to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=vladimir@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox