Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Markus Deuling <deuling@de.ibm.com>
Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc] Fix qC handling in gdbserver
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 17:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070514174118.GF4818@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4638B95C.5060900@de.ibm.com>

On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 06:16:28PM +0200, Markus Deuling wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > GDB is opening /proc/pid on the _local_ machine.  That's silly.
> > gdbserver is usually running on a remote machine; it's only on the
> > local machine during native testing.  The testcase fails because info
> > proc only works for native targets.
> 
> thank you again for your input. The patch attached disables 
> gdb.base/info-proc.exp
> for remote targets.
> 
> Is this ok?
> 
> ChangeLog:
> 	* gdb.base/info-proc.exp: Check is_remote.

Yes, this is OK.  It's a little silly since the user can still type
"info proc" and will get garbage, but we don't need to fix that now.

> Btw,
> shall I rework the qC-Patch () and remove the space? Like

Yes please!

> ? Would that be ok for mainline? I wonder why the manual contains qC packets
> while gdb does not? Is this a new feature or one that should be removed from 
> manual rather?

GDB contains support for it; gdbserver doesn't use it, but other
remote stubs do.  For instance, I think RedBoot does.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-14 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-27 10:27 Markus Deuling
2007-04-27 10:37 ` Pedro Alves
2007-04-27 11:05   ` Markus Deuling
2007-04-27 13:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-05-02 16:18   ` Markus Deuling
2007-05-14 17:41     ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2007-05-15 13:18     ` Ulrich Weigand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070514174118.GF4818@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=deuling@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox