Re: [RFA]: gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/altivec-regs.exp Broken testcase

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:59:39AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Looking at it now, it looks to me like I've got a condition backwards
> in show_endian.  The != should actually be an ==.  I can't test a patch
> for that until I get home next week though.

Home now.  I've tested and checked in this; sorry for the breakage.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

2007-01-20  Daniel Jacobowitz  <dan@codesourcery.com>

	* arch-utils.c (show_endian): Correct reversed condition.

Index: arch-utils.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/arch-utils.c,v
retrieving revision 1.138
diff -u -p -r1.138 arch-utils.c
--- arch-utils.c	13 Jan 2007 23:24:43 -0000	1.138
+++ arch-utils.c	20 Jan 2007 18:16:33 -0000
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static void
 show_endian (struct ui_file *file, int from_tty, struct cmd_list_element *c,
 	     const char *value)
 {
-  if (target_byte_order_user != BFD_ENDIAN_UNKNOWN)
+  if (target_byte_order_user == BFD_ENDIAN_UNKNOWN)
     if (TARGET_BYTE_ORDER == BFD_ENDIAN_BIG)
       fprintf_unfiltered (file, _("The target endianness is set automatically "
 				  "(currently big endian)\n"));