From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Improve end check on rs6000 prologue analyzer
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061130201146.GA23830@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061018200554.GD13273@nevyn.them.org>
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 04:05:54PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:58:08PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Unfortunately, I still get a few regressions, see below. They all
> > seem to be problems with not skipping the complete prologue. I get
> > the feeling that using line number information for prologue skipping
> > is just not reliable :(.
>
> It's true that it isn't completely reliable, but it's usually "good
> enough" and has its own advantages - it's better than accidentally
> walking off into the epilogue, for instance, as this code is currently
> somewhat prone to.
>
> What version of GCC are you using? Perhaps I can reproduce it with a
> different version.
Hi Mark, did you miss this question? I'd really like to figure out why
this patch causes regressions for you.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-30 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-29 21:37 Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-09-30 19:32 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-09-30 20:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-17 21:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-17 22:15 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-10-18 5:41 ` Wu Zhou
2006-10-18 14:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-18 19:58 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-10-18 20:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-30 20:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2007-02-15 20:20 ` Aman Wardak
2007-03-09 15:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-03-11 19:13 ` Mark Kettenis
2007-03-12 12:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-03-12 21:02 ` Mark Kettenis
2007-03-12 21:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-03-12 23:05 ` Mark Kettenis
2007-03-13 4:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-10 21:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-04-11 3:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-11 11:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-03-13 17:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-04-17 2:02 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-04-17 15:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061130201146.GA23830@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox