Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA][2/5] New port: Cell BE SPU (valops.c fix)
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:01:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061128000117.GA21865@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200611272323.kARNNYPo014050@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>

On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 12:23:34AM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> However, I still think there's something fundamentally broken in the
> way value_assign calls VALUE_TO_REGISTER.   As the documentation says,
> that gdbarch functions is supposed to "convert a data value of type
> TYPE to register number REG's raw format".  Calling the conversion
> function with a type that does not actually denote the type of the
> register contents, but some subfield, must break all other implementations
> of that routine as well ...

Except that I suspect there are no other implementations of
VALUE_TO_REGISTER which offer any subfields.  It was usually used for
things like registers which can only hold a float by converting it to
double, and those floating point registers generally can't hold
arbitrary structs or arrays.

There might be some trouble on i386 though... I think you'd need
extraordinary bad luck to trigger it.  A field of a struct spread
across multiple registers.

These three hooks are simply not very clearly defined.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-11-28  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-11 18:38 Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-22 14:15 ` [PING] " Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-22 14:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-22 19:25   ` Jim Blandy
2006-11-22 19:28     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-22 19:55       ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-22 20:30         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-22 20:43           ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-22 20:57             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-22 22:13               ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-22 22:48                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-23 13:57                   ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-23 16:16                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-23 17:55                       ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-23 19:59                         ` Mark Kettenis
2006-11-24  2:08                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-24 15:51                             ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-28 14:56                               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-27 19:31                         ` Jim Blandy
2006-11-27 22:06                           ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-27 22:31                             ` Jim Blandy
2006-11-27 23:23                               ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-27 23:59                                 ` Jim Blandy
2006-11-28  0:01                                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-12-06 16:29                                   ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-12-06 16:43                                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-06 17:10                                       ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-12-06 17:12                                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-07  6:34                                           ` Vladimir Prus
2006-12-06 21:21                                     ` Jim Blandy
2006-12-06 22:02                                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-06 23:24                                         ` Jim Blandy
2006-12-06 23:16                                       ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-12-06 23:39                                         ` Jim Blandy
2006-12-08 15:50                                           ` Ulrich Weigand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061128000117.GA21865@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jimb@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox