From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA][2/5] New port: Cell BE SPU (valops.c fix)
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061122205727.GA15718@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200611222043.kAMKh6KO030466@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 09:43:06PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > I'm wondering if you're describing the latter case, in which case the
> > problem is that we're calling value_to_register on only part of the
> > value we want in the register.
>
> Yes, that's what I was thinking.
OK, that sounds like we need something different here. I'm not sure
quite what. We need to somehow reconstruct the entire value, but we
haven't got a handy parent pointer we can use to get at it. We could
reread it, I suppose.
Does the same thing happen for struct { char w, x, y, z; }?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-22 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-11 18:38 Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-22 14:15 ` [PING] " Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-22 14:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-22 19:25 ` Jim Blandy
2006-11-22 19:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-22 19:55 ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-22 20:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-22 20:43 ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-22 20:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-11-22 22:13 ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-22 22:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-23 13:57 ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-23 16:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-23 17:55 ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-23 19:59 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-11-24 2:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-24 15:51 ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-28 14:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-27 19:31 ` Jim Blandy
2006-11-27 22:06 ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-27 22:31 ` Jim Blandy
2006-11-27 23:23 ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-27 23:59 ` Jim Blandy
2006-11-28 0:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-06 16:29 ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-12-06 16:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-06 17:10 ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-12-06 17:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-07 6:34 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-12-06 21:21 ` Jim Blandy
2006-12-06 22:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-06 23:24 ` Jim Blandy
2006-12-06 23:16 ` Ulrich Weigand
2006-12-06 23:39 ` Jim Blandy
2006-12-08 15:50 ` Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061122205727.GA15718@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox