From: Fred Fish <fnf@specifix.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Patch for QUIT macro support
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:49:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610130648.31875.fnf@specifix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061013133046.GA9478@nevyn.them.org>
On Friday 13 October 2006 06:30, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Do you mean the big async patch? If so it's still worth fixing this in
> isolation.
Yes, just search for the couple of hunks that make changes to "quit_flag".
The key difference between my patch and Nick's is the test in async_request_quit
to avoid call quit twice (once from the QUIT macro and once when the event
loop gets around to checking the signal handlers).
Here's the patch I'm now testing.
-Fred
Index: gdb/event-top.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/event-top.c,v
retrieving revision 1.46
diff -c -r1.46 event-top.c
*** gdb/event-top.c 21 Jul 2006 14:46:53 -0000 1.46
--- gdb/event-top.c 13 Oct 2006 07:49:52 -0000
***************
*** 958,963 ****
--- 1002,1017 ----
{
signal (sig, handle_sigint);
+ /* We used to set the quit flag in async_request_quit, which is either
+ called when immediate_quit is 1, or when we get back to the event
+ loop. This is wrong, because you could be running in a loop reading
+ in symfiles or something, and it could be quite a while before you
+ get to the event loop. Instead, set quit_flag to 1 here, then mark
+ the sigint handler as ready. Then if somebody calls QUIT before you
+ get to the event loop, they will unwind as expected. */
+
+ quit_flag = 1;
+
/* If immediate_quit is set, we go ahead and process the SIGINT right
away, even if we usually would defer this to the event loop. The
assumption here is that it is safe to process ^C immediately if
***************
*** 986,992 ****
void
async_request_quit (gdb_client_data arg)
{
! quit_flag = 1;
quit ();
}
--- 1040,1053 ----
void
async_request_quit (gdb_client_data arg)
{
! /* If the quit_flag has gotten reset back to 0 by the time we get
! back here, that means that an exception was thrown to unwind
! the current command before we got back to the event loop. So
! there is no reason to call quit again here. */
!
! if (quit_flag == 0)
! return;
!
quit ();
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-13 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-13 12:43 Fred Fish
2006-10-13 13:22 ` Fred Fish
2006-10-13 13:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-13 13:49 ` Fred Fish [this message]
2007-01-21 17:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-21 19:23 ` Fred Fish
[not found] ` <200610151800.k9FI0fDS016688@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
2007-01-22 14:41 ` Fred Fish
2007-02-08 14:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-02-08 20:49 ` Nick Roberts
2007-02-08 21:17 ` Fred Fish
2007-02-08 21:51 ` Nick Roberts
2006-10-13 14:58 ` Fred Fish
2007-02-08 14:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-16 0:08 Nick Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200610130648.31875.fnf@specifix.com \
--to=fnf@specifix.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox