From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: pgilliam@us.ibm.com, janani@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch] Pushing Inferior Function Arguments onto Stack on PowerPC64 machines
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 19:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061004191430.GA4179@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061004191056.GA4000@nevyn.them.org>
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 03:10:56PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 03:00:34PM -0400, janani@linux.ibm.com wrote:
> > I am new to this, so my interpretation might not be completely
> > accurate, but the way I read the note below ( a snippet from the GNU
> > GCC Manual about passing function arguments in registers) is that
> > since PPC64 is big endian, even though the default is to pad downward
> > (i.e. right align), if the size if greater than the size of an int,
> > you need to pad upward (left align).
>
> You're trying to answer the wrong question :-)
By the way, your From address (janani@linux.ibm.com) is not valid;
could you fix that?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-04 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-04 19:00 janani
2006-10-04 19:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-04 19:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-10-04 20:19 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-10-04 20:27 ` Andreas Schwab
[not found] ` <OFE88464A1.C58B072A-ON872571FD.006ABA69-862571FD.006C7CFB@us.ibm.com>
2006-10-04 20:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-04 21:02 janani
[not found] <20041026075115.4A2C354AAB5@stray.canids>
[not found] ` <20041026132924.GA26886@nevyn.them.org>
[not found] ` <drow@false.org>
2004-10-26 15:01 ` backtrace changes current source location Felix Lee
2004-10-27 17:35 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-27 17:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-28 0:52 ` Felix Lee
2004-10-29 15:22 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-29 15:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-29 22:07 ` Felix Lee
2004-10-30 0:02 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-30 3:28 ` Felix Lee
2004-11-01 4:38 ` Felix Lee
2004-11-01 16:04 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-01 16:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-05 8:51 ` Felix Lee
2006-10-04 20:43 ` [patch] Pushing Inferior Function Arguments onto Stack on PowerPC64 machines David Edelsohn
2006-10-04 20:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-04 19:54 janani
2006-10-03 19:15 Janani Janakiraman
2006-10-03 19:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-15 13:37 Procedure for large drop? Paul Hilfinger
2005-08-15 14:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-15 21:50 ` Paul Hilfinger
2005-08-16 2:36 ` Jason Molenda
2005-08-20 22:15 ` Paul Hilfinger
2005-08-22 19:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061004191430.GA4179@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=janani@us.ibm.com \
--cc=pgilliam@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox