Re: RFC: Target memory overhaul

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 06:15:55AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:58:10 -0400
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > 
> > > > That was broken for a while (at least since 6.1, maybe 6.0) and is now
> > > > fixed; Eli, is that NEWS-worthy?
> > > 
> > > What is the user-visible change in behavior?
> > 
> > `set trust-readonly-sections on' (documented) used to be ignored;
> > suddenly it is honored again.
> 
> Then I agree that we should mention it in NEWS.

This OK?  I double checked the broken versions - good thing, since I
was wrong.

2006-08-16  Daniel Jacobowitz  <dan@codesourcery.com>

	* NEWS: Mention "set trust-readonly-sections" fix.

---
 gdb/NEWS |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Index: src/gdb/NEWS
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/NEWS	2006-08-16 10:03:16.000000000 -0400
+++ src/gdb/NEWS	2006-08-16 10:09:53.000000000 -0400
@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ running on a Windows system over TCP/IP 
 Cygwin debugging.  Both single-threaded and multi-threaded programs are
 supported.
 
+* The "set trust-readonly-sections" command works again.  This command was
+broken in GDB 6.3, 6.4, and 6.5.
+
 * New commands
 
 set substitute-path

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery