Re: RFC: Target memory overhaul

Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-08-16T14:10:39Z

On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 06:15:55AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:58:10 -0400
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> >
> > > > That was broken for a while (at least since 6.1, maybe 6.0) and is now
> > > > fixed; Eli, is that NEWS-worthy?
> > >
> > > What is the user-visible change in behavior?
> >
> > `set trust-readonly-sections on' (documented) used to be ignored;
> > suddenly it is honored again.
>
> Then I agree that we should mention it in NEWS.

This OK? I double checked the broken versions - good thing, since I
was wrong.

2006-08-16 Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>

* NEWS: Mention "set trust-readonly-sections" fix.

---
gdb/NEWS | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Index: src/gdb/NEWS
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/NEWS 2006-08-16 10:03:16.000000000 -0400
+++ src/gdb/NEWS 2006-08-16 10:09:53.000000000 -0400
@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ running on a Windows system over TCP/IP
Cygwin debugging. Both single-threaded and multi-threaded programs are
supported.

+* The "set trust-readonly-sections" command works again. This command was
+broken in GDB 6.3, 6.4, and 6.5.
+
* New commands

set substitute-path