* [patch] Spelling fixes
@ 2006-05-20 0:27 Fred Fish
2006-05-23 0:21 ` Jim Blandy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Fred Fish @ 2006-05-20 0:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: fnf
Checked in under the 'obvious fix rule', though not sure if current
practice is to record in ChangeLog or not.
2006-05-19 Fred Fish <fnf@specifix.com>
* Makefile.in: Fix spelling of 'explicitly' and 'explicit'.
* dwarfread.c: Fix spelling of 'unexpected'.
* mips-tdep.c: Fix spelling of 'possible' and 'Determine'.
* stack.c: Fix spelling of 'RETURN_VALUE'.
Index: Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.818
diff -u -p -r1.818 Makefile.in
--- Makefile.in 17 May 2006 14:53:02 -0000 1.818
+++ Makefile.in 19 May 2006 20:41:29 -0000
@@ -1274,7 +1274,7 @@ clean-tui:
# describe removing files; the only sort of "re-create a distribution"
# functionality described is if the distributed files are unmodified.
# NB: While GDBSERVER might be configured on native systems, it isn't
-# always included in SUBDIRS. Remove the gdbserver files explictly.
+# always included in SUBDIRS. Remove the gdbserver files explicitly.
distclean: clean
@$(MAKE) $(FLAGS_TO_PASS) DO=distclean "DODIRS=$(SUBDIRS)" subdir_do
rm -f gdbserver/config.status gdbserver/config.log
@@ -1489,7 +1489,7 @@ ALLDEPFILES = \
xcoffread.c xcoffsolib.c \
xstormy16-tdep.c
-# Some files need explict build rules (due to -Werror problems) or due
+# Some files need explicit build rules (due to -Werror problems) or due
# to sub-directory fun 'n' games.
# Provide explicit rule/dependency - works for more makes.
Index: dwarf2read.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/dwarf2read.c,v
retrieving revision 1.196
diff -u -p -r1.196 dwarf2read.c
--- dwarf2read.c 13 May 2006 15:46:38 -0000 1.196
+++ dwarf2read.c 19 May 2006 20:41:32 -0000
@@ -7346,7 +7346,7 @@ read_type_die (struct die_info *die, str
read_base_type (die, cu);
break;
default:
- complaint (&symfile_complaints, _("unexepected tag in read_type_die: '%s'"),
+ complaint (&symfile_complaints, _("unexpected tag in read_type_die: '%s'"),
dwarf_tag_name (die->tag));
break;
}
Index: mips-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/mips-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.391
diff -u -p -r1.391 mips-tdep.c
--- mips-tdep.c 5 May 2006 18:04:04 -0000 1.391
+++ mips-tdep.c 19 May 2006 20:41:34 -0000
@@ -2323,7 +2323,7 @@ struct mips_objfile_private
/* According to the current ABI, should the type be passed in a
floating-point register (assuming that there is space)? When there
- is no FPU, FP are not even considered as possibile candidates for
+ is no FPU, FP are not even considered as possible candidates for
FP registers and, consequently this returns false - forces FP
arguments into integer registers. */
@@ -2644,7 +2644,7 @@ mips_eabi_push_dummy_call (struct gdbarc
return sp;
}
-/* Determin the return value convention being used. */
+/* Determine the return value convention being used. */
static enum return_value_convention
mips_eabi_return_value (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
Index: stack.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/stack.c,v
retrieving revision 1.138
diff -u -p -r1.138 stack.c
--- stack.c 30 Mar 2006 16:37:13 -0000 1.138
+++ stack.c 19 May 2006 20:41:34 -0000
@@ -1829,7 +1829,7 @@ If you continue, the return value that y
frame). */
frame_pop (get_current_frame ());
- /* Store RETURN_VAUE in the just-returned register set. */
+ /* Store RETURN_VALUE in the just-returned register set. */
if (return_value != NULL)
{
struct type *return_type = value_type (return_value);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] Spelling fixes
2006-05-20 0:27 [patch] Spelling fixes Fred Fish
@ 2006-05-23 0:21 ` Jim Blandy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jim Blandy @ 2006-05-23 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fnf; +Cc: gdb-patches
Fred Fish <fnf@specifix.com> writes:
> Checked in under the 'obvious fix rule', though not sure if current
> practice is to record in ChangeLog or not.
>
> 2006-05-19 Fred Fish <fnf@specifix.com>
>
> * Makefile.in: Fix spelling of 'explicitly' and 'explicit'.
> * dwarfread.c: Fix spelling of 'unexpected'.
> * mips-tdep.c: Fix spelling of 'possible' and 'Determine'.
> * stack.c: Fix spelling of 'RETURN_VALUE'.
Obvious changes to comments just need a log entry saying 'Doc fixes.'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-05-22 23:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-05-20 0:27 [patch] Spelling fixes Fred Fish
2006-05-23 0:21 ` Jim Blandy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox