Re: Some more multi-fork fixes

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:09:43AM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:41:15PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> >>I'm up against a bit of a brick wall at the moment.  I've got
> >>patches in my source tree to unify the single-threaded and
> >>multi-threaded code in the Linux native layer into a single
> >>combined target.  But since this is an inherently single-threaded
> >>operation the multi-threaded code totally falls down - switching
> >>forks doesn't preserve things like the LWP list, leading to
> >>messy timeouts.  I'm going to find some minimally painful
> >>way to make the two of them talk to each other.
> >
> >
> >FYI, I've got that more or less working now (as well as it was
> >previously). I'll post it in a bit.
> >
> 
> Hey Daniel, what's the status on this?

Sorry, didn't close the circle: I did post this.  It's in these
two:
  http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-02/msg00493.html
  http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-02/msg00494.html

I've still got to work out the glibc side of the fourth patch
in that series, but I don't think there's anything stopping me
from committing the others; I should do that.  Does the first
one above look good to you?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery