From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3713 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2006 19:16:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 3705 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Mar 2006 19:16:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:16:53 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FHn6Z-0007d0-K3; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:16:51 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:54:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Some more multi-fork fixes Message-ID: <20060310191651.GA29281@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20060115190757.GA10454@nevyn.them.org> <43DA7BFE.2070100@redhat.com> <20060224224115.GA6792@nevyn.them.org> <20060224230957.GA7834@nevyn.them.org> <4411CEF7.5040601@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4411CEF7.5040601@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00162.txt.bz2 On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:09:43AM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:41:15PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > >>I'm up against a bit of a brick wall at the moment. I've got > >>patches in my source tree to unify the single-threaded and > >>multi-threaded code in the Linux native layer into a single > >>combined target. But since this is an inherently single-threaded > >>operation the multi-threaded code totally falls down - switching > >>forks doesn't preserve things like the LWP list, leading to > >>messy timeouts. I'm going to find some minimally painful > >>way to make the two of them talk to each other. > > > > > >FYI, I've got that more or less working now (as well as it was > >previously). I'll post it in a bit. > > > > Hey Daniel, what's the status on this? Sorry, didn't close the circle: I did post this. It's in these two: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-02/msg00493.html http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-02/msg00494.html I've still got to work out the glibc side of the fourth patch in that series, but I don't think there's anything stopping me from committing the others; I should do that. Does the first one above look good to you? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery