From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: cope with varying prelink base addresses
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060214020854.GA9848@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060213175637.4ac50484@ironwood.lan>
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 05:56:37PM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:03:30 -0200
> Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Yuck. Fair enough. Anyhow, I don't see any evidence that GDB
> > actually supports any such broken l_addr semantics, so it's not like
> > the patch would be breaking anything. If anything, it would be
> > enabling gdb to work on such a system work, assuming l_ld is set up
> > correctly.
Yes - in fact I wish we'd thought of this at the time :-)
> I agree. (I've been careful to not let in any patches which would support
> alternate l_addr semantics.)
>
> I've been looking over your patch and would like to see it committed
> so long as it receives a some more testing first. Would it be possible
> for you to test it on Solaris system and a BSD system?
If not, I can certainly manage Solaris; I don't have any BSD systems
here but perhaps Mark K. can oblige?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-14 2:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-08 5:35 Alexandre Oliva
2006-02-08 6:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-10 0:15 ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-02-08 21:40 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-02-10 0:09 ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-02-10 1:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-13 19:03 ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-02-14 0:56 ` Kevin Buettner
2006-02-14 2:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-02-14 18:40 ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-02-14 18:53 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-02-20 18:16 ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-02-20 21:49 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-02-20 17:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-20 17:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-23 20:22 ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-02-23 20:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-24 7:42 ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-02-28 1:50 ` Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060214020854.GA9848@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox