From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFA: Support Windows extended error numbers in safe_strerror
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060209145753.GA25270@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15661.192.87.1.22.1139496247.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl>
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:44:07PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > For example, here's a suggestion for what I think is more seamless
> > integration of MinGW and other ``illegal aliens'', here for the
> > `select' issue:
> >
> > int gdb_select (...)
> > {
> > if (select_hook)
> > return (*select_hook) (...);
> > else
> > return select (...);
> > }
> >
> > We make `select_hook' a global pointer to a function, and then MinGW
> > can define its own emulation on win32-something.c and plug its address
> > into `select_hook'.
>
> There is absolutely no reason for this additional complexity. GDB will
> never be able to run on two different hosts at once. Just having two
> different implementations and have configure.host choose the apprpriate
> one will work just fine.
FYI, I'm willing to (and now planning to) go ahead with Mark's plan,
but let me point out a disadvantage to each of these two options...
Right now, we only know of POSIX-ish systems and native Windows as
interesting hopes. I'm sure many of us fervently hope that there are
no others worth going through this for. But is it really wise to
create a host-specific override mechanism which can't scale?
If I do this Mark's way, overriding a function requires putting it into
"posix-hdep.c" and another implementation in "mingw-hdep.c". There's
no way to override only of the functions in posix-hdep.c. If I do it
Eli's way, the function can live anywhere, and is overridden by setting
"function_hook" (or "function_override"?) in _initialize_mingw_hdep.
So a new host could override just select.
Of course there's a flip side. If I do it Eli's way, the default
version has to compile and link. Which happens to be the case for
the two examples we have today, but also a pretty limiting assumption.
Neither of them's perfect. Mark's is marginally less intrusive, and
I'm halfway to an implementation already.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-09 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-03 21:55 Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-03 23:25 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-02-03 23:39 ` Christopher Faylor
2006-02-04 3:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-04 6:29 ` Jim Blandy
2006-02-04 10:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-04 10:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-04 14:35 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-02-04 14:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-04 15:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-05 0:15 ` Christopher Faylor
2006-02-05 4:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-05 19:34 ` Christopher Faylor
2006-02-05 19:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-05 20:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-05 20:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-05 21:50 ` Christopher Faylor
2006-02-05 21:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-05 22:33 ` Christopher Faylor
2006-02-05 22:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-06 6:35 ` Christopher Faylor
2006-02-06 17:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-05 22:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-05 22:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-06 2:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-06 4:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-05 22:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-05 22:44 ` Christopher Faylor
2006-02-05 23:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-06 5:14 ` Christopher Faylor
2006-02-06 7:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-06 8:47 ` Corinna Vinschen
2006-02-06 12:07 ` Bob Rossi
2006-02-06 14:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-06 18:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-04 10:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-05 0:27 ` Christopher Faylor
2006-02-05 2:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-05 4:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-05 7:39 ` Jim Blandy
2006-02-05 20:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-05 20:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-05 22:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-06 2:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-05 4:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-04 1:06 ` Jim Blandy
2006-02-04 3:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-04 6:22 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2006-02-04 10:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-04 13:53 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-02-04 15:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-04 10:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-04 15:33 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-02-04 15:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-04 10:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-04 13:14 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-02-05 7:41 ` Jim Blandy
2006-03-02 0:53 ` Michael Snyder
2006-02-04 11:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-04 14:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-04 15:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-04 15:57 ` David Ayers
2006-02-06 17:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-06 17:54 ` Christopher Faylor
2006-02-06 18:23 ` Jim Blandy
2006-02-06 19:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-06 19:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-06 20:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-06 22:55 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-02-06 22:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-08 0:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-08 21:08 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-02-08 21:12 ` Bob Rossi
2006-02-08 23:17 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-02-08 23:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-09 0:12 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-02-09 1:54 ` Bob Rossi
2006-02-09 7:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-09 9:18 ` Jim Blandy
2006-02-08 21:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-08 23:10 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-02-08 23:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-09 14:40 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-02-09 15:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-09 20:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-09 8:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-09 14:44 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-02-09 14:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-02-09 20:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-09 21:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-09 22:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-09 20:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-09 22:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-10 7:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-10 16:18 ` Christopher Faylor
2006-02-10 16:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-10 18:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-10 21:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060209145753.GA25270@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox