Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFA/htdocs] Add announce of gdb-6.4 branch
@ 2005-11-03  5:58 Joel Brobecker
  2005-11-07  4:08 ` Joel Brobecker
  2005-11-07  4:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2005-11-03  5:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 505 bytes --]

I think this sort of change could go in using the obvious rule, but it
doesn't hurt to ask, at least the first time...

2005-11-02  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>

        * index.html: Mention the creation of the gdb-6.4 branch.
        Remove the old announcement of the gdb-6.3 branch creation.
        * news/index.html: Mention the creation of the gdb-6.4 branch.

OK to apply? Verified locally by displaying the two pages in my local
browser using the "file://" protocol.

Thanks,
-- 
Joel

[-- Attachment #2: news.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1869 bytes --]

Index: index.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gdb/htdocs/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.162
diff -u -p -r1.162 index.html
--- index.html	25 Oct 2005 21:42:25 -0000	1.162
+++ index.html	3 Nov 2005 01:52:23 -0000
@@ -102,6 +102,16 @@ better.
 
 -->
 
+<dt>November 2, 2005: <b>GDB 6.4 branch created</b></dt>
+<dd>
+<p> The GDB 6.4 branch (<tt>gdb_6_4-branch</tt>) has been created.
+To check out a copy of the branch use:
+<pre>
+cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/src co -r gdb_6_4-branch gdb
+</pre>
+<p>
+</dd>
+
 <dt>November 9, 2004: <b>GDB 6.3 Released!</b></dt>
 <dd>
 <p> The latest version of GDB, version 6.3, is available for <a
@@ -127,16 +137,6 @@ into GDB.  In this release, support is l
 <p>
 </dd>
 
-<dt>October 19, 2004: <b>GDB 6.3 branch created</b></dt>
-<dd>
-<p> The GDB 6.3 branch (<tt>gdb_6_3-branch</tt>) has been created.
-To check out a copy of the branch use:
-<pre>
-cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/src co -r gdb_6_3-branch gdb
-</pre>
-<p>
-</dd>
-
 </dl>
 
 Late breaking information, such as recently added features, can be
Index: news/index.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gdb/htdocs/news/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.67
diff -u -p -r1.67 index.html
--- news/index.html	25 Oct 2005 21:42:25 -0000	1.67
+++ news/index.html	3 Nov 2005 01:52:24 -0000
@@ -61,6 +61,16 @@ better.
 
 -->
 
+<dt>November 2, 2005: <b>GDB 6.4 branch created</b></dt>
+<dd>
+<p> The GDB 6.4 branch (<tt>gdb_6_4-branch</tt>) has been created.
+To check out a copy of the branch use:
+<pre>
+cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/src co -r gdb_6_4-branch gdb
+</pre>
+<p>
+</dd>
+
 <dt>November 9, 2004: <b>GDB 6.3 Released!</b></dt>
 <dd>
 <p> The latest version of GDB, version 6.3, is available for <a

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA/htdocs] Add announce of gdb-6.4 branch
  2005-11-03  5:58 [RFA/htdocs] Add announce of gdb-6.4 branch Joel Brobecker
@ 2005-11-07  4:08 ` Joel Brobecker
  2005-11-07  4:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2005-11-07  4:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

Ping?

BTW: Andrew just reminded me privately of the following in MAINTAINERS:

Web pages.              Jim Kingdon             jkingdon@engr.sgi.com  ++
                        (anyone can edit; kingdon is just lead maintainer)

I don't want to go against the latest agreement which seemed to be
that all changes to htdocs should be RFA'ed, hence the ping. But I do
think that we should update the MAINTAINERS file if we want to make
it official (and obviously, Jim has to be contacted).


On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 05:55:12PM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> I think this sort of change could go in using the obvious rule, but it
> doesn't hurt to ask, at least the first time...
> 
> 2005-11-02  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>
> 
>         * index.html: Mention the creation of the gdb-6.4 branch.
>         Remove the old announcement of the gdb-6.3 branch creation.
>         * news/index.html: Mention the creation of the gdb-6.4 branch.
> 
> OK to apply? Verified locally by displaying the two pages in my local
> browser using the "file://" protocol.
> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Joel

> Index: index.html
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gdb/htdocs/index.html,v
> retrieving revision 1.162
> diff -u -p -r1.162 index.html
> --- index.html	25 Oct 2005 21:42:25 -0000	1.162
> +++ index.html	3 Nov 2005 01:52:23 -0000
> @@ -102,6 +102,16 @@ better.
>  
>  -->
>  
> +<dt>November 2, 2005: <b>GDB 6.4 branch created</b></dt>
> +<dd>
> +<p> The GDB 6.4 branch (<tt>gdb_6_4-branch</tt>) has been created.
> +To check out a copy of the branch use:
> +<pre>
> +cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/src co -r gdb_6_4-branch gdb
> +</pre>
> +<p>
> +</dd>
> +
>  <dt>November 9, 2004: <b>GDB 6.3 Released!</b></dt>
>  <dd>
>  <p> The latest version of GDB, version 6.3, is available for <a
> @@ -127,16 +137,6 @@ into GDB.  In this release, support is l
>  <p>
>  </dd>
>  
> -<dt>October 19, 2004: <b>GDB 6.3 branch created</b></dt>
> -<dd>
> -<p> The GDB 6.3 branch (<tt>gdb_6_3-branch</tt>) has been created.
> -To check out a copy of the branch use:
> -<pre>
> -cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/src co -r gdb_6_3-branch gdb
> -</pre>
> -<p>
> -</dd>
> -
>  </dl>
>  
>  Late breaking information, such as recently added features, can be
> Index: news/index.html
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gdb/htdocs/news/index.html,v
> retrieving revision 1.67
> diff -u -p -r1.67 index.html
> --- news/index.html	25 Oct 2005 21:42:25 -0000	1.67
> +++ news/index.html	3 Nov 2005 01:52:24 -0000
> @@ -61,6 +61,16 @@ better.
>  
>  -->
>  
> +<dt>November 2, 2005: <b>GDB 6.4 branch created</b></dt>
> +<dd>
> +<p> The GDB 6.4 branch (<tt>gdb_6_4-branch</tt>) has been created.
> +To check out a copy of the branch use:
> +<pre>
> +cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/src co -r gdb_6_4-branch gdb
> +</pre>
> +<p>
> +</dd>
> +
>  <dt>November 9, 2004: <b>GDB 6.3 Released!</b></dt>
>  <dd>
>  <p> The latest version of GDB, version 6.3, is available for <a


-- 
Joel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA/htdocs] Add announce of gdb-6.4 branch
  2005-11-03  5:58 [RFA/htdocs] Add announce of gdb-6.4 branch Joel Brobecker
  2005-11-07  4:08 ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2005-11-07  4:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  2005-11-08  1:46   ` Joel Brobecker
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2005-11-07  4:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches

On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 05:55:12PM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> I think this sort of change could go in using the obvious rule, but it
> doesn't hurt to ask, at least the first time...
> 
> 2005-11-02  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>
> 
>         * index.html: Mention the creation of the gdb-6.4 branch.
>         Remove the old announcement of the gdb-6.3 branch creation.
>         * news/index.html: Mention the creation of the gdb-6.4 branch.
> 
> OK to apply? Verified locally by displaying the two pages in my local
> browser using the "file://" protocol.

Sorry missed this, by all means go ahead.

IIRC you should run the shell script on any of the web pages that you
modify, to update the timestamp.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA/htdocs] Add announce of gdb-6.4 branch
  2005-11-07  4:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2005-11-08  1:46   ` Joel Brobecker
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2005-11-08  1:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

> > 2005-11-02  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>
> > 
> >         * index.html: Mention the creation of the gdb-6.4 branch.
> >         Remove the old announcement of the gdb-6.3 branch creation.
> >         * news/index.html: Mention the creation of the gdb-6.4 branch.
> > 
> > OK to apply? Verified locally by displaying the two pages in my local
> > browser using the "file://" protocol.
> 
> Sorry missed this, by all means go ahead.
> 
> IIRC you should run the shell script on any of the web pages that you
> modify, to update the timestamp.

Checked in (with the script rerun). Thanks!

-- 
Joel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-07 23:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-03  5:58 [RFA/htdocs] Add announce of gdb-6.4 branch Joel Brobecker
2005-11-07  4:08 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-07  4:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-08  1:46   ` Joel Brobecker

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox