Re: [PATCH] x86 CFI extensions

[Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>]

> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:27:47 +0200
> From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
> 
> >>> Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl> 18.09.05 00:31:44 >>>
> >> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 16:59:39 -0400
> >> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> >> 
> >> > 2005-09-13  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@novell.com>
> >> > 
> >> > 	* amd64-tdep.h (AMD64_FCTRL_REGNUM, AMD64_FSTAT_REGNUM,
> >> > 	AMD64_MXCSR_REGNUM): New.
> >> > 	* amd64-tdep.c (amd64_dwarf_regmap): Add eflags, selector regs,
> >> > 	mxcsr, fp control and status words.
> >> > 	* i386-tdep.c (): Add selector regs, mxcsr, fp control and
> >> > status
> >> > 	words.
> >> 
> >> Mark, did you want to take a look at this?  It seems fine to me.
> >
> >Sorry, slipped through.  Thanks for reminding me Daniel!
> >
> >Jan, what's the status new DWARF register numbers?  At least the
> amd64
> >ones look very Linux-specific to me.  They're not listed in the AMD64
> >ABI (at least not version 0.95), and AFAICT gcc won't produce them
> >either.
> 
> In addition to Daniel's reply: while gcc will probably never care about
> them (and thus never produce them), the gas now can (patch went in last
> week), and while initially this indeed is for Linux, any OS should want
> them for describing exception and interrupt frames...
> 

This is ok.  However, I don't see your name listed in gdb/MAINTAINERS.
Do you have a valid copyright assignment for GDB?

Mark