Re: [RFC] Unconditionally include shared library code

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:46:08PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>    Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 10:56:27 -0400
>    From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
>    On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 04:51:25PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>    > Hmm, that'd work.  We'll have to face the inconsistent interface issue
>    > eventually, but it's a seperate issue indeed.  Any objection if I
>    > introduce a config/tm-solib.h and use that?  Its purpose is a bit more
>    > clear, and the risk of abuse is smaller.  The mechanical update is not
>    > without risk, but I'm willing to take it.  Deal?
> 
>    I like it.  It is indeed a tm file and shouldn't be used any other way.
> 
> I reworked the patch to avoid shlib.[ch].  Looking at the changes I
> think the risk of changing solib.h into tm-solib.h under config/ is
> riskier than leaving config/ alone and simply removing the #defines
> from solib.h.  I'm moving towards checking in the attached patch at
> the end of the coming week.

I like this even more!  Kevin?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC